skills.rest
aRustyDev
aRustyDevCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@aRustyDevGitHub

requesting-code-review

Dispatch a code-review subagent to assess code changes before merging.

Updated Jan 28, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#feedback#code-review#pull-request#production-readiness#template-driven
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aRustyDev/git-atomic --skill requesting-code-review-arustydev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/aRustyDev/git-atomic/tree/main/.claude/skills/method-code-review-requesting-dev
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aRustyDev/git-atomic --skill requesting-code-review-arustydev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams enforce early, consistent code quality by instructing an automated review process before merging. It ensures that changes are evaluated against defined requirements and architectural considerations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Template-driven code review: standardizes the feedback process using the code-reviewer template.
  • Pre-merge quality gate: validates that implementations meet the plan, quality, and testing expectations.
  • Collaborative feedback loop: supports rapid, structured input after each task or feature increment.

Quick Start

Use the requesting-code-review skill to trigger a code-review for the latest commit and generate structured feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a pre-merge code review for production readiness?▼

To automate a pre-merge code review, this skill dispatches a code-review subagent on your latest commits to assess production readiness, architecture, and testing before you merge changes to main.

What is template-driven code review for pull requests?▼

Template-driven code review standardizes the feedback process by applying a consistent code-reviewer template to evaluate code quality, reference the original plan, and specify what was implemented in your pull requests.

How do I enforce consistent code quality checks during feature iterations?▼

You can enforce consistent code quality checks during feature iterations by triggering an automated review process that validates implementations against defined requirements and architectural considerations before merging.

Does this automated code review work for both small fixes and major refactors?▼

Yes, the automated code review applies to task-driven development, including both small fixes and major refactors, ensuring structured input is generated after each task or feature increment.

Can I use this to validate if my implementation meets the original development plan?▼

Yes, the skill evaluates your code changes by referencing the original plan, specifying what was implemented, and assessing whether the implementation meets the expected quality and testing expectations.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
franroafranroa

requesting-code-review

Dispatch a code-reviewer subagent with Git SHAs for production-readiness assessment.

Community
Intermediate
ultramaxoAIultramaxoAI

requesting-code-review

Route code changes through a code-review subagent and summarize strengths and issues.

Official
Intermediate
dismantldismantl

multi-axis-review

Review pull request diffs across ten quality axes with severity ratings.

Community
Advanced
tense-itense-i
1

requesting-code-review

Dispatch a code-reviewer subagent after each task before merging to main.

Community
Intermediate