requesting-code-review

Name: requesting-code-review
Availability: InStock
Author: ClyptAI

Automate peer-review workflows for code changes using a specialized subagent.

Updated Mar 8, 2026

Search Tags:#git #collaboration #subagent #quality-assurance #code-review #review-process

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/ClyptAI/Clypt-Backend --skill requesting-code-review-clyptai

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/ClyptAI/Clypt-Backend/tree/main/.agents/skills/superpowers/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ClyptAI/Clypt-Backend --skill requesting-code-review-clyptai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured protocol for initiating code reviews within task-driven development, ensuring changes are evaluated before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured review prompts: automatically generate focused briefs that map to completed work and requested feedback.
Subagent-driven evaluation: orchestrates a dedicated code-review subagent to assess changes, risks, and quality.
Traceable workflow: references git SHAs and artifacts to support precise, repeatable review processes.

Quick Start

Dispatch the code-reviewer subagent after completing a task by summarizing what was implemented and what feedback is requested.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate code review before merging changes to main?▼

Automated code review before merging uses a subagent to validate implementation quality based on completed task artifacts. It generates focused review briefs mapping to the work done, ensuring changes are evaluated against the plan before integration into the main branch.

What is subagent-driven code review and how does it work?▼

Subagent-driven code review orchestrates a dedicated evaluation agent to assess changes, risks, and quality. It references git SHAs and artifacts to support a precise, repeatable review process that validates whether implementation meets the original plan.

How do I start a code review for a completed feature implementation?▼

Start a code review by dispatching the code-reviewer subagent after completing a task. Summarize what was implemented and what feedback is requested to automatically generate focused briefs mapping to the completed work.

Can I use automated code review for individual contributor workflows?▼

Automated code review applies to both individual contributors and teams in task-driven development. It supports feature implementations and pre-merge validation, ensuring changes are evaluated regardless of team size.

Does the code review process track git SHAs for traceable feedback?▼

The code review process references git SHAs and artifacts to support precise, repeatable review workflows. This traceable approach ensures feedback is artifact-driven and explicitly validates the implementation against the original plan.

What's the best way to validate implementation quality in task-driven development?▼

Validating implementation quality in task-driven development is best handled by a structured code-review protocol that applies explicit plan-based validation. It uses a subagent to assess risks and generate artifact-driven feedback before merging.