skills.rest
coctostan
coctostanCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

requesting-code-review

Dispatch a reviewer subagent to evaluate code changes before merging.

69|9|Updated Feb 8, 2026
Search Tags:#development#github#subagent#quality-assurance#code-review#pull-request#review-process
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/coctostan/pi-superpowers --skill requesting-code-review-coctostan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/coctostan/pi-superpowers/tree/main/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/coctostan/pi-superpowers --skill requesting-code-review-coctostan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Streamlines code-review by ensuring every change is evaluated for quality and compliance before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dispatch a code-reviewer subagent with a structured template to evaluate changes.
  • Capture strengths, issues, and readiness recommendations for stakeholders.
  • Integrate with development workflows for pre-merge checks and post-task reviews.

Quick Start

Dispatch the code-reviewer subagent for your latest changes to receive an initial feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews before a pull request merge?▼

Automating code reviews before a merge involves dispatching a reviewer subagent to evaluate changes and provide structured feedback. This ensures early detection of issues and captures readiness recommendations for stakeholders.

What is the best way to integrate quality assurance checks into a GitHub development workflow?▼

Integrating quality assurance into a GitHub workflow uses a code-reviewer subagent to evaluate new changes. It applies across feature work and major refactors, providing structured feedback and documentation of review outcomes.

Can I get structured feedback for major refactoring tasks using a subagent?▼

Yes, you can get structured feedback for major refactoring tasks by dispatching a dedicated reviewer subagent. The subagent uses a template to capture strengths, issues, and readiness recommendations for your changes.

Does automated code review provide planning traceability for developer workflows?▼

Automated code review provides planning traceability by documenting review outcomes and integrating with developer workflows. It ensures every change is evaluated for quality and compliance before merging.

When do I need to dispatch a code-reviewer subagent?▼

You need to dispatch a code-reviewer subagent for new changes, feature work, major refactors, and pre-merge checks. This ensures early detection of issues and provides structured feedback with escalation paths.

What limitations should I expect from an automated code review process?▼

Automated code review limitations depend on the subagent's template scope, focusing on structured feedback and escalation paths rather than replacing human oversight entirely. It documents review outcomes but requires human judgment for complex compliance.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
DaddyElonMusk69DaddyElonMusk69

github-code-review

Review git diffs and GitHub pull requests with structured feedback.

Community
Advanced
rajveersingh11rajveersingh11

pr-review-triage

Automate pull request triage with CI status, review comments, and merge readiness.

Community
Intermediate
johnrtiptonjohnrtipton
4

pipeline-refactor

Automate multi-stage code refactoring pipelines with safety checks and documentation.

Community
Advanced
nicolanoviellnicolanoviell
2

code-review

Review code changes for bugs, style issues, and best practices.

Community
Intermediate