requesting-code-review

Request formal code reviews at development milestones before merging.

Updated Mar 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ironbob/SuperPower_light --skill requesting-code-review-ironbob
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/ironbob/SuperPower_light/tree/main/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ironbob/SuperPower_light --skill requesting-code-review-ironbob

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This capability ensures that major changes receive a formal review before merging, reducing risk and drift by centering evaluation on the work product rather than the broader session history.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Directs reviews to critical milestones in subagent-driven development.
  • Provides precise context for reviewers, including what was implemented and why.
  • Enforces feedback loops and improves production readiness before merge.

Quick Start

Submit a milestone for review before merging to ensure alignment with requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I trigger a code review before merging a major feature?

You request a formal code review by submitting your completed milestone for evaluation before merging. This ensures major features meet requirements by focusing on the work product and providing precise context to reviewers about what was implemented and why.

When should I request a code review in subagent-driven development?

Request a code review after completing key milestones in subagent-driven development rather than after every micro-step. This enforces clear feedback loops and improves production readiness by centering evaluation on the work product instead of broader session history.

What is the best way to ensure production readiness before a merge?

The best way to ensure production readiness before a merge is to request a formal code review targeting major milestones. This enforces feedback loops, captures implemented changes, and guides reviewers to focus on critical issues before the merge process.

How does milestone-based code review differ from reviewing every step?

Milestone-based code review evaluates major features at critical milestones rather than every micro-step. This reduces risk and drift by centering evaluation on the work product itself, providing precise context about implemented changes to guide reviewers toward critical issues.

Can I use this review request process for micro-steps in development?

This review request process targets major milestones in subagent-driven development rather than every micro-step. It enforces formal feedback loops and captures implemented changes specifically to ensure major features meet requirements before merging.