requesting-code-review

Standardize code review findings by attaching a code-reviewer.md template to your pull request, which enforces severity-labeled findings, impacted files, and concrete recommendations to reduce ambiguity and speed up reviews.

The best way to structure code review severity levels is by categorizing findings into critical, important, and informational tiers, ensuring the reviewer highlights risks and suggested mitigations consistently across diffs or commits.

A code review template improves pull request quality gates by enforcing a structured findings format that requires impacted files and concrete recommendations, generating a focused review prompt that speeds up the review process.

Yes, you can use standardized review templates for commits across different codebases and teams. The template applies universally to pull requests, diffs, or commits to ensure consistent, high-signal review requests.

Yes, you need a structured template in a code-reviewer.md file format to request a code review. This template is attached to your PR description to generate a consistent, severity-labeled findings report.

You should use severity labels in code review findings to consolidate review requests into a single standardized format, reducing ambiguity and ensuring reviewers focus on the most critical risks and suggested mitigations first.