requesting-code-review

Route task changes to a code-review subagent for focused assessment.

321|26|Updated Mar 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mkurman/tamux --skill requesting-code-review-mkurman
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/mkurman/tamux/tree/main/skills/development/superpowers/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mkurman/tamux --skill requesting-code-review-mkurman

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

AI-assisted code-review routing ensures issues are surfaced early by delegating evaluation to a specialized subagent, reducing cognitive load and preventing context leakage.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dispatch the code-reviewer subagent to evaluate new commits or task changes against a predefined plan.
  • Provide precise context: What was implemented, the plan/requirements, and the relevant git range for reproducible feedback.
  • Receive structured feedback categorized by severity and instructs how to act on it.
  • Integrates into task-driven development to enforce early, frequent reviews.

Quick Start

Request a review by dispatching the subagent with a clear description of What Was Implemented, Plan/Requirements, and Git range.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for new commits in task-based development?

Automated code review routes task changes to a dedicated subagent for focused assessment. Dispatch the reviewer with a clear description of what was implemented, the plan requirements, and the git range to receive structured feedback categorized by severity.

How does AI code review routing prevent context leakage during pull requests?

AI code review routing prevents context leakage by delegating evaluation to a specialized subagent. This reduces cognitive load and surfaces issues early by applying focused assessment strictly to the provided git range and predefined plan.

What context is required to generate actionable code review feedback for a feature implementation?

Actionable code review feedback requires a clear description of what was implemented, the plan or requirements, and the relevant git range details. Providing this precise context ensures reproducible feedback and verifies alignment with the predefined plan.

When should I use a dedicated subagent for post-merge validation instead of manual checks?

Use a dedicated subagent for post-merge validation after major changes or new branches to enforce early, frequent reviews. It applies specialized assessment to task-driven development, ensuring fast feedback and alignment without manual cognitive overhead.

Can I integrate AI-assisted code review into an existing task-driven development workflow?

Yes, AI-assisted code review integrates into task-driven development to enforce early, frequent reviews. Dispatch the subagent with the implemented changes, requirements, and git range to receive structured feedback and ensure ongoing alignment.

What are the limitations of using AI subagents for pull request reviews?

AI subagent pull request reviews depend entirely on the precise context you provide, including the implementation details, plan, and git range. Without clear inputs, the subagent cannot generate actionable feedback or properly assess alignment with the predefined plan.