requesting-code-review

Dispatch a code-reviewer subagent with task context for pre-merge checks.

Updated Aug 20, 2022
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Neroro64/dotfiles --skill requesting-code-review-neroro64
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/Neroro64/dotfiles/tree/main/configs/omp/agent/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Neroro64/dotfiles --skill requesting-code-review-neroro64

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code changes can drift from requirements and quality standards. This skill provides a structured mechanism to request a focused review by a specialized reviewer subagent, ensuring issues are caught early and context is preserved.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated dispatch of a code-reviewer subagent with task context
  • Templates and placeholders to communicate what was implemented and what is expected
  • Pre-merge checks and feedback cycles to catch issues early

Quick Start

Dispatch the code-reviewer subagent with the task context template to start a review.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review requests for pre-merge checks in a Git workflow?

Automating code review requests involves dispatching a specialized subagent with tailored context, such as base/head SHAs and a diff-oriented checklist, to assess work before merging. This preserves context and catches issues early.

What is a subagent-based code review and how does it work?

A subagent-based code review dispatches a specialized reviewer with structured task context and a formal output template. It works by providing a structured plan, implemented change descriptions, and a diff-oriented checklist to evaluate work before merging.

Can I use this automated peer review for task-driven feature implementations?

Yes, automated peer review is suitable for task-driven development, feature implementations, and pre-merge checks across software projects. It ensures code changes do not drift from requirements and quality standards.

What context do I need to provide to a code-reviewer subagent?

You need to provide a structured plan, descriptions of implemented changes, and a diff-oriented review checklist including base/head SHAs. This context allows the subagent to accurately assess work against expected requirements.

What is the best way to catch code drift from requirements before merging?

The best way to catch code drift before merging is to dispatch a code-reviewer subagent with task context templates. This structured mechanism ensures focused review and provides a formal output template to highlight issues early.