requesting-code-review

Automate code review by dispatching a subagent to evaluate changes against standards.

Updated Jul 3, 2026

Search Tags:#code quality #code review #version control #software development #automated review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/pxlcrtiv/opencode-setup --skill requesting-code-review-pxlcrtiv

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/pxlcrtiv/opencode-setup/tree/main/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pxlcrtiv/opencode-setup --skill requesting-code-review-pxlcrtiv

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of code reviews, helping to maintain code quality and catch issues early.

Core Features & Use Cases

Automated Code Review: Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to automatically review code changes.
Custom Context: Provides precise context for evaluation without revealing the developer's thought process.
Feedback Loop: Collects feedback on code changes, allowing for quick iterations and improvements.
Use Case: Before merging a feature branch into the main branch, use this Skill to ensure the code meets the required standards.

Quick Start

Dispatch a code reviewer for the changes in the 'feature-branch'.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate code reviews before merging a feature branch?▼

You can automate code review by dispatching a subagent to evaluate code changes against predefined standards before merging a feature branch. This automates feedback collection and helps maintain code quality in software development workflows.

What is automated code review and how does it work with version control?▼

Automated code review deploys a specialized agent to assess version control changes against predefined requirements. It evaluates diffs without compromising developer privacy and provides a feedback loop for quick iterations before merging branches.

Do I need git to run an automated code review on my changes?▼

Yes, you need git to provide the appropriate context for the code review process. The reviewer requires version control diffs to assess changes against standards and requirements without revealing the developer's underlying thought process.

Can I use an automated code reviewer for software development with multiple contributors?▼

Yes, automated code review is suitable for maintaining code quality in software development environments where multiple contributors are involved. It catches issues early and provides precise evaluation context for distributed teams.

What is the best way to maintain code quality without exposing developer context?▼

The best way is to use an automated code review subagent that provides precise evaluation context without revealing the developer's thought process. This maintains code quality while dispatching standardized feedback loops for iterative improvements.

Are there limitations to using an automated code review subagent?▼

Automated code review requires appropriate git context to function correctly and cannot assess changes without version control. It is limited to evaluating predefined standards and may not capture nuanced architectural decisions.