requesting-code-review

Name: requesting-code-review
Availability: InStock
Author: rawtoast

Automate code-review workflow initiation with diff and SHA placeholders.

1|Updated Jan 17, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #workflow #development #quality #subagent #code-review #pull-request

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/RawToast/OwO --skill requesting-code-review-rawtoast

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/RawToast/OwO/tree/main/packages/example/skill/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RawToast/OwO --skill requesting-code-review-rawtoast

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews are critical for catching issues before they reach production; this Skill automates the initiation and standardization of code-review requests, reducing cycle times and increasing review quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

Automates dispatch of a code-reviewer subagent after task completion or major feature work.
Provides structured feedback templates and placeholders to guide reviewers.
Tracks and references diff, base/head SHAs, and stores feedback to gate progress and documentation.

Quick Start

Trigger a code-review request after completing a task to dispatch the code-reviewer subagent and begin feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate code review requests before merging a pull request?▼

Automating code review requests involves dispatching a code-reviewer subagent after task completion to catch issues before merging. This workflow uses structured templates with diff and base/head SHA placeholders to standardize feedback capture for production readiness.

What information do I need to provide to initiate an automated code-review workflow?▼

To initiate a code-review workflow, you need a review template, placeholders for the diff, and the base/head SHAs. Providing these inputs ensures the automated reviewer subagent can properly track branch changes and store structured feedback for production gating.

When should I trigger an automated code review in my development workflow?▼

You should trigger an automated code review after completing a task, finishing major feature work, or preparing major changes across branches. This ensures formal validation and structured feedback are captured before any code progresses toward production deployment.

Does automated code review work for tracking changes across multiple branches?▼

Yes, automated code review applies to major changes across branches by tracking the diff alongside base and head SHAs. This validates feature work and captures feedback to gate progress and ensure production readiness before merging.

What's the best way to standardize feedback capture during a code review?▼

The best way to standardize feedback capture is using structured review templates with placeholders for diffs and base/head SHAs. This guides the code-reviewer subagent to consistently document issues and store feedback to gate production readiness.

What are the limitations of automating code review dispatch for feature work?▼

Automating code review dispatch requires predefined templates and correct base/head SHAs to function properly. It standardizes feedback gating for production readiness but depends on accurate diff placeholders to validate major changes across branches effectively.