requesting-code-review

Coordinate a formal code review via the code-reviewer subagent before merge.

1|Updated Apr 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Rysnz/OpenHarness --skill requesting-code-review-rysnz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/Rysnz/OpenHarness/tree/main/src/crates/core/builtin_skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Rysnz/OpenHarness --skill requesting-code-review-rysnz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill ensures code changes are evaluated by an expert reviewer before merging, reducing defects and maintaining project quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Formal review gate: mandates a structured assessment of changes prior to merge to catch issues early.
  • Plan alignment: checks that implemented work matches the defined plan or requirements and uses git SHAs to verify progress.
  • Audit trail: provides clear feedback and a documented rationale for acceptance or rejection decisions.

Quick Start

Trigger a code review by dispatching the code-reviewer subagent after finishing a task and before merging.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review before a git merge?

Automate code review before a git merge by dispatching a code-reviewer subagent to evaluate recent changes. The subagent checks plan alignment and provides a documented rationale for acceptance or rejection decisions.

What do I need to provide for an automated code review?

Automated code review requires a clear description of what was implemented, the plan or requirements, and the starting and ending git SHAs to compare. This ensures the reviewer can verify progress and alignment accurately.

When should I trigger a code review in a development workflow?

Trigger a code review at key milestones like feature completions, before critical releases, or prior to merging. This ensures a fresh assessment of code changes to catch issues early and reduce defects.

Does code review work with subagent-driven development workflows?

Code review works with subagent-driven development workflows by coordinating a formal code-reviewer subagent. It evaluates recent changes before merge to maintain project quality and reduce defects.

What is the best way to check if implemented work matches the original plan?

Check if implemented work matches the original plan by using git SHAs to verify progress. The code reviewer compares the starting and ending SHAs against the defined requirements to ensure alignment.

What are the limitations of using a subagent for code review?

A subagent for code review relies on receiving a clear implementation description and accurate git SHAs. Without these precise inputs, the automated reviewer cannot effectively evaluate changes or provide reliable readiness feedback.