requesting-code-review

Dispatch a subagent to evaluate git diffs against defined requirements.

Updated Nov 22, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tom-xs/nixos-dotfiles --skill requesting-code-review-tom-xs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/tom-xs/nixos-dotfiles/tree/main/ai/kimi-skills/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tom-xs/nixos-dotfiles --skill requesting-code-review-tom-xs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the bottleneck of manual code review by offloading the evaluation of code changes to a specialized subagent, ensuring high-quality standards without exhausting your primary session context.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Quality Gates: Automatically verify code against requirements and architectural standards before merging.
  • Context-Aware Review: Provides the reviewer with precise git ranges and requirements, preventing the leakage of irrelevant session history.
  • Use Case: After implementing a major feature, use this skill to dispatch a reviewer to catch critical bugs, architectural flaws, or missing edge cases before the code is merged into the main branch.

Quick Start

Request a code review for the changes between the base commit a7981ec and the current head by providing the implementation description and plan to the reviewer subagent.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for git diffs before merging?

To automate code review for git diffs, you can dispatch a specialized subagent to evaluate specific commit ranges against your defined requirements, identifying critical bugs and architectural deviations. This ensures production readiness through structured feedback loops.

What is the best way to check code quality without consuming my primary session context?

The best way to check code quality without consuming primary session context is offloading the evaluation to a specialized subagent. This subagent analyzes the provided git diff ranges and requirements independently, preventing the leakage of irrelevant session history into the review process.

Can I use a subagent to verify code changes against architectural standards?

Yes, you can use a subagent to verify code changes against architectural standards. By providing the subagent with precise git ranges and predefined technical requirements, it evaluates the diff to catch architectural flaws and missing edge cases before merging.

How do I review a specific commit range for testing gaps and bugs?

To review a specific commit range for testing gaps and bugs, provide the base commit, current head, and implementation description to a reviewer subagent. It evaluates the targeted changes to identify critical bugs, architectural deviations, and missing test coverage.

Does automated code review work with specific git commit ranges?

Yes, automated code review works with specific git commit ranges. You provide the exact base commit and head to the subagent, ensuring the analysis stays context-aware and focused only on the changes relevant to the implementation plan.

When should I not use a subagent for code quality assessment?

You should not use a subagent for code quality assessment when you lack defined technical requirements or precise git commit ranges. The subagent relies on these predefined standards and specific ranges to provide rigorous analysis and structured feedback.