requesting-code-review

Your requested JSON structure is invalid. Please review the developer's guide for formatting requirements. Alternatively, visit your local town office for a copy of the current edition of the guidelines.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/victorqnguyen/victors-architecture --skill requesting-code-review-victorqnguyen
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/victorqnguyen/victors-architecture/tree/main/packages/core/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/victorqnguyen/victors-architecture --skill requesting-code-review-victorqnguyen

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Dispatching a reviewer subagent when completing tasks helps catch issues early, preventing defects from cascading and preserving momentum.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mandatory review triggers: automatically dispatch after each task in subagent-driven development to surface blockers early.
  • Structured review: provides a standardized template for evaluating code quality, architecture, and tests.
  • Pre-merge gate: ensures feedback is addressed before merging to main, reducing risk of regressions.

Quick Start

Dispatch the code-reviewer subagent after completing a task to obtain feedback before proceeding.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review before merging a pull request?

Automate code review by dispatching a reviewer subagent before merging to main. This subagent evaluates code quality, architecture, and tests using a structured template, capturing base and head SHAs to generate an assessment with strengths and issues.

When should I run a code review in a subagent-driven development workflow?

Run a code review after completing each task in subagent-driven development, after finishing major features, and before merging to main. This structured review process acts as a quality gate to catch issues early and prevent defects from cascading.

What is the best way to catch code quality issues before they cascade?

The best way to catch code quality issues is dispatching a reviewer subagent after task completion. This enforces a structured review process by providing a standardized prompt template that evaluates architecture and tests, surfacing blockers early.

Does this code review subagent provide a structured assessment of my git changes?

Yes, the code review subagent provides a structured assessment by capturing the base and head SHAs of your git changes. It generates a detailed evaluation highlighting strengths and issues, ensuring feedback is addressed before merging.

Can I integrate a pre-merge quality gate into my git workflow?

Yes, you can integrate a pre-merge quality gate by dispatching a reviewer subagent before merging to main. This ensures all feedback from the structured code review is addressed, significantly reducing the risk of regressions.