requesting-code-review

Verify staged Git changes with security scans and baseline checks before commits.

3|Updated Apr 1, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #security #quality #diff #pre-commit #lint #code-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/vtgiang-dotcom/Solo-Code-Harness --skill requesting-code-review-vtgiang-dotcom

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-code-review
Source: https://github.com/vtgiang-dotcom/Solo-Code-Harness/tree/main/.gemini/antigravity/skills/requesting-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vtgiang-dotcom/Solo-Code-Harness --skill requesting-code-review-vtgiang-dotcom

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automated pre-commit verification blocks insecure or low-quality changes from entering main branches, reducing risk and rework.

Core Features & Use Cases

Automated pre-commit verification including static security scans, baseline-aware quality gates, an independent reviewer subagent, and an auto-fix loop.
Ensures no agent verifies its own work by design, leveraging a two-stage review and code-enforced guardrails to prevent self-review bias.
Integrates with standard Git workflows to catch regressions before commits or pushes, with language-agnostic baseline tests and actionable feedback.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to run the pre-commit verification on your staged changes to perform security scans, baseline checks, and auto-fix.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I run automated pre-commit security and quality checks on staged changes?▼

To run automated pre-commit verification, you ask the AI to perform security scans, baseline checks, and auto-fix on your staged Git diffs. This catches regressions and blocks insecure changes before they enter your main branch.

How does an automated pre-commit review prevent self-review bias?▼

Pre-commit review prevents self-review bias by using a two-stage workflow with an independent reviewer subagent. This design ensures no agent verifies its own work, enforcing code guardrails to block high-risk changes.

Can I use pre-commit linting and static scans across different programming languages?▼

Yes, pre-commit linting and static scans apply language-agnostic baseline tests and diff-based analysis across language ecosystems. This ensures standard Git workflow integration catches regressions regardless of the tech stack.

What is the best way to enforce code quality gates before a Git commit?▼

The best way to enforce code quality gates before a Git commit is through diff-based analysis and baseline comparisons. These automated guardrails verify staged changes and apply an auto-fix loop to maintain standards.

When do I need baseline-aware quality gates for my code changes?▼

You need baseline-aware quality gates when you want to prevent regressions in existing code while allowing new development. These gates compare staged diffs against project baselines to ensure automated pre-commit security and quality.

Does pre-commit automated verification block high-risk changes automatically?▼

Yes, pre-commit automated verification blocks high-risk changes automatically by enforcing guardrails through diff-based analysis and optional reviewer subagent checks. This prevents insecure or low-quality code from entering main branches.