requesting-staff-session

Coordinate multi-perspective staff planning sessions with tier selection and Plan vs Review modes.

5|2|Updated Mar 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude --skill requesting-staff-session
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-staff-session
Source: https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude/tree/main/plugins/coordinator/skills/requesting-staff-session
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude --skill requesting-staff-session

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinating work that benefits from multiple viewpoints can lead to fragmented decisions and slowdowns. This skill provides a structured way to assemble, guide, and synthesize input from a diverse staff to produce a cohesive plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tiered engagement: Lightweight, Standard, and Full staff sessions to fit the decision context.
  • Plan mode vs Review mode: Explicitly switch between planning a solution and critiquing an existing plan.
  • Scoping guidance: A checklist to align objectives, context, and constraints before starting.

Quick Start

Invoke /staff-session with a chosen mode and tier to begin a multi-perspective planning session.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-staff-session

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate a multi-perspective staff planning session for a cross-domain project?

A staff planning session synthesizes diverse architectural and product viewpoints into a cohesive plan. It uses a scoping checklist to align objectives before guiding tier-selected debate across the team.

What's the best way to scope objectives before starting a team planning debate?

Scoping objectives before a team planning debate requires a checklist that aligns project context and constraints. This skill provides that checklist to ensure all staff members share an understanding before discussion begins.

Can I use a lightweight tier for routine planning sessions instead of a full staff debate?

Lightweight, Standard, and Full tiers are available to fit your decision context. You can use a lightweight tier for routine planning to limit team composition and debate scope while still producing a consensus-driven outcome.

How do I run a staff session to critique an existing plan instead of creating a new one?

To critique an existing plan, you switch the staff session into Review mode. This mode explicitly guides the diverse staff to evaluate and critique the current plan rather than generating a new solution from scratch.

When should I assemble a full staff session versus a lightweight engagement for project scoping?

Full staff sessions are appropriate for complex architecture or cross-domain projects needing deep consensus. Lightweight engagement suits simpler decisions where fragmented viewpoints are less likely to slow down the planning process.