requirement-review

Review requirement documents and generate structured Go/No-Go decision artifacts.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins --skill requirement-review-taptap
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requirement-review
Source: https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins/tree/main/plugins/test/skills/requirement-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins --skill requirement-review-taptap

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This workflow performs a systematic quality check of requirement documents before review meetings, identifying logic gaps, missing constraints, cross-team dependencies, and items requiring explicit confirmation so teams can make clear Go/No-Go decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured 5‑stage pipeline: init → fetch → understand → review → output to ensure repeatable, auditable reviews.
  • 12‑dimension checklist and templates: enforces coverage across functionality, state flows, data constraints, security, UX, testing, and impact scope.
  • Conditional multi‑agent parallel analysis: automatically runs three perspective agents for complex requirements and performs cross-validation of findings.
  • Artifacts and export: writes requirement_understanding.md, review_checklist.md, and report.md and supports Feishu export and optional Figma/GitLab lookups.

Quick Start

Provide a Feishu Story link or requirement document link to generate requirement_understanding.md, review_checklist.md, and a concise report ready for the review meeting.

Frequently Asked Questions about requirement-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review requirement documents for a Go/No-Go decision meeting?

To review requirement documents for a Go/No-Go decision, apply a structured checklist covering functionality, state flows, and data constraints to identify logic gaps. This generates a review report and checklist to ensure teams can make clear decisions.

Can I use Feishu links for pre-meeting requirement review and preparation?

Yes, you can use Feishu links for requirement review by providing a Feishu Story link or wiki/docx document. The system fetches the content to generate understanding files, checklists, and a concise report ready for the meeting.

What does a 12-dimension requirement checklist cover for pre-review preparation?

A 12-dimension requirement checklist covers functionality, state flows, data constraints, security, UX, testing, and impact scope. It enforces comprehensive coverage to identify cross-team dependencies and missing constraints before the review.

How do I identify cross-team dependencies and logic gaps in requirement documents?

To identify cross-team dependencies and logic gaps, run a systematic quality check with multi-agent parallel analysis. This cross-validation detects missing constraints and items requiring explicit confirmation across complex requirements.

Does the requirement review process support Figma and code references?

Yes, the requirement review process supports optional Figma and code references. Providing these design links and code references helps perform deeper pre-review analysis and meeting preparation.

What artifacts are generated after a systematic requirement quality check?

After a systematic requirement quality check, the artifacts generated are requirement_understanding.md, review_checklist.md, and report.md. These structured files support multi-stage review flows and can be exported to Feishu.