requirements-review

To identify ambiguities in a requirements document, submit the file for automated review. The system highlights unclear scopes, conflicts, and incomplete points, guiding stakeholder clarifications and generating a revised analysis with an audit trail.

The best way to guide stakeholder clarification for conflicting requirements is through interactive review. Based on user feedback, the system suggests multiple implementation paths and trade-offs, resolving conflicts and producing updated requirements notes.

To perform a structured requirements review and generate an audit trail, submit your analysis document. The process reviews for interaction problems, guides clarifications, and saves a concise audit trail with updated notes to output/doc/requirements-analysis-review.md.

Yes, you can use this requirements analysis review for aligning stakeholders on a new product. Upload the requirements analysis document, and the system will highlight key risks, generate a revision checklist, and produce actionable modification points for alignment.

Yes, the requirements review process supports analyzing output from prior requirements analysis files. It applies directly to provided requirement documents or existing output/doc/requirements-analysis.md files to review content and guide necessary clarifications.