requirements_scope_lite

Convert PRDs into SMART requirements with Given/When/Then criteria.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ukrsite/kiro-workflows --skill requirements-scope-lite
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requirements_scope_lite
Source: https://github.com/ukrsite/kiro-workflows/tree/main/skills/sdlc/requirements_scope_lite
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ukrsite/kiro-workflows --skill requirements-scope-lite

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Converts raw PRDs into concise, testable functional requirements (Max 200 lines) to reduce ambiguity and accelerate validation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Converts PRDs into a compact set of SMART requirements with Given/When/Then acceptance criteria.
  • Produces a structured output consisting of Requirements Assessment, Refined Functional Requirements (table), and Risk & MoSCoW Summary.
  • Helps align stakeholders by delivering a clear, testable feature contract suitable for review and sign-off.

Quick Start

Provide a PRD and receive a compact, testable set of SMART requirements within 200 lines.

Frequently Asked Questions about requirements_scope_lite

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I convert a PRD into testable functional requirements?

To convert a PRD into testable functional requirements, input the raw PRD document to generate 5-8 SMART requirements structured with Given/When/Then acceptance criteria and a MoSCoW risk summary.

What are SMART functional requirements with Given/When/Then acceptance criteria?

SMART functional requirements are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound conditions validated using Given/When/Then acceptance criteria to ensure clear pass/fail outcomes for user workflows.

How to write acceptance criteria for product features using MoSCoW prioritization?

Writing acceptance criteria with MoSCoW prioritization involves generating a structured risk summary that categorizes functional requirements into Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, and Won't-have tiers.

Can I use this to refine business analysis requirements for stakeholder sign-off?

Yes, you can refine business analysis requirements for stakeholder sign-off by transforming raw PRDs into a compact, verifiable feature contract under 200 lines that reduces ambiguity and accelerates validation.

What is the best way to structure functional requirements analysis from a raw PRD?

The best way to structure functional requirements analysis is producing a three-part output: a requirements assessment, a refined functional requirements table, and a risk summary with explicit constraints.

Does this requirements analysis approach work for complex user workflows with many constraints?

Yes, this requirements analysis approach works for complex user workflows by applying SMART criteria to extract 5-8 verifiable requirements while explicitly documenting known risks and constraints in a MoSCoW summary.