research-assurance-triage

Classifies research tasks into assurance lanes and routes them to validation skills and contracts.

1|Updated Dec 13, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ZK-Theory/TDL --skill research-assurance-triage-zk-theory
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-assurance-triage
Source: https://github.com/ZK-Theory/TDL/tree/main/.agents/skills/research-assurance-triage
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ZK-Theory/TDL --skill research-assurance-triage-zk-theory

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Research tasks can pass software tests while still being scientifically wrong — incorrect formulas, null models, topology semantics, estimands, provenance, or paper claims. This Skill gives managers a triage procedure to classify tasks by assurance lane and attach machine-checkable or human-review requirements before dispatch. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Assurance Lane Classification: Sorts tasks into six lanes — topology, stochastic/null model, statistical/panel, representation, output/provenance, and paper claim. - Dispatch and Review Checklists: Provides a Task Prompt block, worker evidence expectations, and a manager review checklist covering seeds, parameters, schemas, and caches. - Lane Routing Table: Maps each lane to judgment skills and deterministic enforcement contracts for follow-up validation. - Use Case: Before dispatching a task that recomputes permutation p-values, a manager uses this Skill to identify the stochastic-null lane, require a Monte Carlo formula contract, and demand provenance fields in the output JSON. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to triage a planned research task using the research-assurance-triage skill and produce the Research Assurance Requirements block for the task prompt.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-assurance-triage

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What are the limitations of machine-checkable research claims?

Some claims, such as paper-facing prose fidelity to pre-registered decision rules, are human-review-only and have no enforcing contract. These must be stated explicitly as review questions in the task prompt rather than assumed covered by tests.