research-gap

Analyze the literature through five lenses: population gaps (unstudied groups), methodological gaps (missing research designs), contextual gaps (unexamined settings), temporal gaps (outdated findings), and theoretical gaps (unapplied frameworks). Then draft a gap statement and test whether it is researchable and meaningful.

The main types are population gaps, methodological gaps, contextual or situational gaps, temporal gaps, and conceptual or theoretical gaps. Each type points to a different kind of white space where a new study can contribute.

Use the template: Although existing research has addressed X, little is known about the specific population, context, method, or phenomenon. State that no studies have examined the gap in your setting, and name the practical or theoretical consequence left unaddressed.

A gap is researchable if you can actually collect data on it, if closing it would matter to theory, practice, or policy, and if you have access to the population or context. The Skill returns a yes, partially, or no verdict with reasoning.

The recommended next step is drafting a problem statement grounded in the gap, or conducting additional literature searching if the evidence of the gap is thin. The gap statement feeds directly into the problem statement chapter.