What problem does it solve? Writing competitive grant proposals requires mastering each funding agency's distinct review criteria, formatting rules, page limits, and strategic priorities, and mistakes like exceeding page limits or weak broader impacts statements cause otherwise strong proposals to be rejected. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Agency-Specific Guidance: Detailed references covering NSF (PAPPG 24-1, Intellectual Merit + Broader Impacts), NIH (Specific Aims, R01 modular budgets), DOE, DARPA (Heilmeier Catechism, BAAs), and Taiwan NSTC (CM03 form, bilingual abstracts). - Proposal Component Templates: Ready-to-use templates for NSF project summaries, NIH specific aims pages, and budget justifications with worked calculations. - Review and Resubmission Strategy: Guidance on review criteria, writing principles, common mistakes, and responding to summary statements in resubmissions. - Use Case: A researcher preparing an NIH R01 application can draft a Specific Aims page, structure the 12-page Research Strategy around Significance, Innovation, and Approach, and build a compliant modular budget justification. ## Quick Start Help me write an NSF proposal with a compelling broader impacts section and a compliant 15-page project description.