What problem does it solve? Writing competitive grant proposals requires mastering each funding agency's distinct review criteria, formatting rules, page limits, and budget conventions, and mistakes in any of these areas sink otherwise strong research ideas. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Agency-Specific Guidance: Detailed references for NSF (PAPPG 24-1, Intellectual Merit + Broader Impacts), NIH (Specific Aims, R01/R21 mechanisms, salary caps), DOE, DARPA (Heilmeier Catechism, BAAs), and Taiwan NSTC (CM03 form, bilingual abstracts). - Component Templates and Guides: Ready-to-use templates for NSF project summaries, NIH Specific Aims pages, and budget justifications, plus in-depth guides on broader impacts and review criteria. - Resubmission and Review Strategy: Guidance for NIH A1 resubmissions, NSF revisions, and framing proposals around scored review criteria. - Use Case: A principal investigator drafting an NIH R01 can get a structured Specific Aims page, a compliant modular budget justification, and a significance/innovation narrative aligned with the 1-9 scoring criteria. ## Quick Start Help me write an NSF proposal project description with strong broader impacts for my computational biology research.