research-judging

Evaluate AI-generated research outputs using structured JSON judgments.

13|Updated Jan 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Butanium/claude-lab --skill research-judging
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-judging
Source: https://github.com/Butanium/claude-lab/tree/main/plugins/clab/skills/research-judging
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Butanium/claude-lab --skill research-judging

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluate AI-generated research outputs using structured JSON judgments.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Provides a repeatable judging pipeline with a clear rubric (criteria.md) and a strict JSON schema (schema.json).
  • Supports model-agnostic evaluation by applying consistent scoring across samples and exportable results.
  • Use Case: A team reviews hundreds of AI-generated drafts and needs auditable, comparable assessments.

Quick Start

Run claude -p on a directory of samples using the provided criteria and schema to generate structured judgments.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-judging

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate AI-generated research outputs with a structured rubric?

To evaluate AI-generated research outputs with a structured rubric, this Skill applies a defined criteria.md and a strict JSON schema to standardize scoring and enable auditable comparisons across multiple samples.

How does structured JSON judging work for multiple AI research samples?

Structured JSON judging works by enforcing a defined rubric and a strict JSON schema across multiple AI research samples, ensuring consistent scoring and enabling machine-validated, auditable comparisons between outputs.

Can I use a custom JSON schema to standardize scoring for AI drafts?

Yes, you can enforce a custom JSON schema defined in schema.json alongside a rubric in criteria.md to standardize scoring and ensure consistent, machine-validated results across hundreds of AI-generated drafts.

What is the best way to generate auditable comparisons across hundreds of research drafts?

The best way to generate auditable comparisons across hundreds of research drafts is to run a model-agnostic evaluation pipeline that applies a consistent scoring rubric and outputs structured JSON judgments.

Does this research judging pipeline work without external dependencies?

Yes, this research judging pipeline operates without external dependencies, relying solely on its internal criteria.md rubric and schema.json to produce structured JSON judgments for AI-generated research outputs.

How do I run automated research evaluation on a directory of samples?

You run automated research evaluation by executing the pipeline on a directory of samples using the provided criteria and schema, which generates structured JSON judgments with consistent scoring.