research

To perform codebase investigation, define testable research questions, classify them as factual or evaluative, and prioritize sources like official docs, code, tests, and changelogs. This structured approach synthesizes cross-referenced findings to support planning decisions.

When investigating library design patterns, map and prioritize sources including official docs, source code, tests, and changelogs. Gathering evidence from these prioritized sources ensures reliable cross-referenced findings for your structured research output.

Yes, this structured research approach applies to codebases, libraries, and design patterns across multiple projects. It guides question design, source mapping, and evidence synthesis specifically when thorough context is needed before planning.

Classify research questions as factual or evaluative to guide your code analysis scope. Defining clear, testable questions focuses the investigation and directs source selection, ensuring gathered evidence directly supports structured planning outputs.

Start a guided research session for code analysis by listing your testable questions and selecting top sources like official docs and code to evaluate first. This initiates the structured process of mapping evidence and synthesizing cross-referenced findings.

You need structured research before planning codebase changes because it provides a disciplined approach to investigations, guiding source selection and cross-referencing evidence. This improves planning accuracy by ensuring decisions rely on reliable, synthesized findings rather than assumptions.