research-paper-writer

Automate IEEE and ACM academic research paper creation with structured workflows.

Updated Mar 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Mohamed-Elkahef/test-project --skill research-paper-writer-mohamed-elkahef
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-paper-writer
Source: https://github.com/Mohamed-Elkahef/test-project/tree/main/.claude/skills/research-paper-writer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Mohamed-Elkahef/test-project --skill research-paper-writer-mohamed-elkahef

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Writing formal academic research papers that meet strict IEEE or ACM publication standards is time-consuming and error-prone, requiring deep knowledge of formatting rules, citation styles, and scholarly writing conventions that many researchers lack.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dual Standard Support: Generates papers compliant with both IEEE and ACM formatting guidelines, including layout, typography, and citation rules.
  • Structured Workflow: Guides users through every stage of paper writing, from outline development to final submission checklists, with tailored guidance for survey, experimental, and other common paper types.
  • Use Case: A graduate student preparing a conference paper on context-aware systems can use this skill to ensure correct section structure, proper in-text citations, and adherence to ACM formatting requirements without manually referencing style guides.

Quick Start

Use the research-paper-writer skill to draft a 10-page IEEE-formatted experimental research paper on a new algorithm for detecting hallucinations in vision-language models, including a full methodology section, experiment results, and properly formatted references.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-paper-writer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a research paper that complies with IEEE or ACM formatting standards?

To write a research paper compliant with IEEE or ACM standards, you must apply strict rules for two-column layouts, numbered headings, and citation styles. Automating this generation ensures adherence to publication requirements without manual style guide checks.

How do I format in-text citations and reference lists for an academic conference paper?

Formatting citations and reference lists for a conference paper requires applying domain-specific scholarly writing conventions. This involves generating numbered references and structuring the bibliography according to the target publication's style guidelines.

Can I use an automated tool to draft the methodology and experiment sections for a survey paper?

Yes, you can use automated academic writing tools to draft methodology and experiment sections for survey papers. They provide structured workflows tailored to different paper types, guiding you from outline development through full section drafting.

What is the best way to structure an academic research paper for a journal submission?

The best way to structure an academic research paper for a journal submission is by following a structured workflow that covers outline development, section drafting, and a final submission checklist. This ensures logical flow and compliance with scholarly writing conventions.

Does automated paper writing support both ACM and IEEE two-column layout requirements?

Yes, automated academic writing supports both ACM and IEEE two-column layout requirements. It handles the typography, layout constraints, and structural standards necessary for conference and journal submissions across both formatting guidelines.

What are the limitations of using automated tools for scholarly writing and citation formatting?

Limitations of using automated tools for scholarly writing include the need for human oversight to verify domain-specific accuracy and logical flow. While they handle structural standards and citation formatting, researchers must still validate the underlying scientific arguments.