research-paper-writing

Write ML research papers for NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR from experiment design through submission.

Updated Jun 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Chensihakniroth/ANAKOT-AGENT --skill research-paper-writing-chensihakniroth
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-paper-writing
Source: https://github.com/Chensihakniroth/ANAKOT-AGENT/tree/main/skills/research/research-paper-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Chensihakniroth/ANAKOT-AGENT --skill research-paper-writing-chensihakniroth

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires semanticscholar, arxiv, habanero, requests, scipy, numpy, matplotlib, SciencePlots, and includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Producing a publication-ready ML/AI research paper requires coordinating literature review, experiment design, execution, statistical analysis, LaTeX writing, review simulation, and venue-specific submission requirements, which is error-prone and time-consuming when done ad hoc. ## Core Features & Use Cases - End-to-End Research Pipeline: Covers eight phases from project setup and literature review through experiment execution, analysis, drafting, self-review, and submission, with explicit feedback loops between phases. - Verified Citation Workflow: Fetches BibTeX programmatically via Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, and arXiv APIs with a mandatory 5-step verification process to prevent hallucinated citations. - Venue Templates and Checklists: Ships official LaTeX templates for ICML, ICLR, NeurIPS, ACL, AAAI, and COLM plus pre-submission checklists covering page limits, reproducibility statements, and ethics requirements. - Use Case: A researcher with an existing codebase asks the agent to turn their results into an ICML submission; the skill designs claim-mapped experiments, monitors runs, computes significance tests, drafts the paper in the ICML template, and simulates reviewer feedback before submission. ## Quick Start Use the research-paper-writing skill to turn my experiment results in this repository into a draft ICML paper with verified citations and statistical analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-paper-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a machine learning paper for NeurIPS or ICML?▼

Follow an iterative pipeline: define a one-sentence contribution, map each claim to a supporting experiment, run experiments with incremental result saving, compute statistical significance, then draft in the official venue LaTeX template. Finish with a simulated self-review and the venue's mandatory checklist before submission.

How to get verified BibTeX citations for a research paper?▼

Fetch BibTeX programmatically via DOI content negotiation from CrossRef or the Semantic Scholar API rather than generating from memory. Verify each paper exists in at least two sources, and mark anything unverifiable as a placeholder citation for manual checking.

What statistical tests should ML papers report?▼

Report error bars with the method specified, 95% confidence intervals via bootstrapping, McNemar's test for paired method comparisons, and effect sizes such as Cohen's h. Always state sample sizes and number of independent runs.

Does the skill support non-empirical papers like surveys or theory?▼

Yes, the pipeline covers theory, survey, benchmark, and position papers in addition to empirical ML work. It also includes guidance for human evaluation design, negative results framing, and post-acceptance deliverables like posters and code releases.

What are the page limits for ICML, ICLR, and NeurIPS submissions?▼

ICML allows 8 pages for submission, ICLR and NeurIPS allow 9 pages, ACL long papers allow 8, AAAI allows 7, and COLM allows 9. References and appendices are unlimited at all of these venues, and camera-ready versions typically get one extra page.

Why do AI-generated citations fail in research papers?▼

AI-generated citations have roughly a 40% error rate, producing fabricated titles, wrong venues, and non-existent DOIs. The mitigation is a mandatory verification workflow: search, verify in two sources, retrieve BibTeX via DOI, validate the claim, then add to the bibliography.