What problem does it solve?
Producing a rigorous, conference-ready ML/AI paper is hard because you must coordinate literature review, experiment design/execution, correct statistical analysis, accurate citation management, and iterative revisions without losing the narrative contribution.
Core Features & Use Cases
- End-to-end research lifecycle loop: iteratively cycles between experiment design, execution/monitoring, analysis, drafting, self-review, revision, and submission.
- Evidence and citation integrity guardrails: enforces “never hallucinate citations” via programmatic verification and marks unverifiable items as [CITATION NEEDED].
- Structured experiment-to-writing bridge: generates an experiment log to connect raw results to paper prose and prevent re-deriving numbers inaccurately.
- Conference requirements and review readiness: incorporates venue checklists (NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR/ACL/AAAI/COLM) and universal pre-submission validation.
- Iterative refinement strategy selection: applies an autoreason methodology to decide when and how to refine drafts based on task constraints and evaluation reliability.
- Human evaluation planning (when needed): includes guidance for designing annotation studies, computing agreement metrics, and reporting ethics/reproducibility details.
Quick Start
Use this skill to produce a NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR/ACL-style paper by first running Phase 0 (project setup and contribution framing), then completing experiments and analysis before drafting sections grounded in a created experiment log.