research-refine

Refine vague research directions into implementation-oriented method plans.

1|Updated Jul 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test --skill research-refine-dogekiki
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-refine
Source: https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test/tree/main/.trae/skills/research-refine
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test --skill research-refine-dogekiki

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the common research bottleneck where a promising idea remains too vague or overbuilt to be actionable, helping you anchor your problem and refine your technical route into a concrete, paper-worthy plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Problem Anchoring: Freezes your core research problem to prevent scope creep and drift during the refinement process.
  • Iterative Review: Uses a specialized reviewer model to stress-test your proposal for technical specificity, frontier leverage, and contribution quality.
  • Use Case: When you have a rough idea for a new model architecture but aren't sure how to validate it, this skill guides you through a multi-round refinement process to produce a focused, implementation-ready experiment roadmap.

Quick Start

Use the research-refine skill to decompose my idea for a new diffusion-based planning agent into a concrete research proposal.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-refine

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn a vague research idea into a concrete methodology plan?

To turn a vague research idea into a concrete methodology plan, you need iterative review to anchor your core problem and stress-test technical specificity. This prevents scope creep and refines rough concepts into implementation-oriented, paper-ready experiment roadmaps.

What is the best way to design experiments for a new model architecture proposal?

Designing experiments for a new model architecture proposal requires problem anchoring to freeze your core research question. A specialized reviewer then evaluates your technical route for frontier leverage and contribution quality to produce a focused, implementation-ready validation roadmap.

How does iterative review improve academic writing and research proposals?

Iterative review improves academic writing and research proposals by stress-testing them for technical specificity and contribution quality. This multi-round refinement process ensures your methodology is frontier-aware, technically feasible, and anchored to a specific problem.

Do I need local literature scanning to refine an AI research proposal?

Yes, you need local literature scanning to refine an AI research proposal effectively. It ensures your methodology remains frontier-aware and contribution-focused by validating the technical feasibility and novelty of your experiment design against existing work.

Can I use this methodology refinement process for technical research outside of AI?

Yes, you can use this methodology refinement process for technical research outside of AI. It applies to any academic or technical research project requiring high-fidelity, frontier-aware methodology and implementation-oriented problem decomposition.

Why does my research direction keep drifting during proposal writing?

Your research direction drifts during proposal writing due to a lack of problem anchoring. Freezing your core research problem early prevents scope creep, allowing iterative review to focus on technical specificity rather than constantly redefining the scope.