research-refine

Refines vague research directions into concrete method proposals via iterative GPT-5.5 review rounds.

Updated Jul 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL --skill research-refine-lingjie-wang
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-refine
Source: https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL/tree/main/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/research-refine
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL --skill research-refine-lingjie-wang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Researchers often have a clear problem but only a fuzzy technical route, leading to bloated proposals, contribution sprawl, or drift away from the original bottleneck. This Skill turns a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, implementation-ready method plan through structured multi-round external review. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Problem Anchor Freezing: Extracts an immutable bottom-line problem, bottleneck, non-goals, and success criteria that every revision round must preserve, with explicit drift detection. - Iterative GPT-5.5 Review Loop: Sends proposals to a Codex-hosted reviewer that scores 7 dimensions (problem fidelity, method specificity, contribution quality, frontier leverage, feasibility, validation focus, venue readiness) and repeats until score >= 9 or 5 rounds. - Checkpoint Recovery: Persists state to REFINE_STATE.json after each phase so interrupted sessions resume from the last completed phase with reviewer thread continuity. - Use Case: A researcher says "refine my approach for long-context video understanding" and receives a full proposal with system graph, training recipe, minimal claim-driven validation, score history, and a final report ready to hand off to experiment planning. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to refine your research plan by describing your problem and rough approach, for example: refine my approach to reducing hallucination in retrieval-augmented generation.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-refine

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I refine a vague research idea into a concrete method plan?

Provide your problem and rough approach, and the skill freezes a Problem Anchor, scans grounding papers, drafts a full method proposal, then iterates with a GPT-5.5 reviewer until the overall score reaches 9 or 5 rounds pass. The final proposal includes system design, training recipe, and minimal validation experiments.

What does the GPT-5.5 reviewer score in each research proposal round?

The reviewer scores seven dimensions: problem fidelity, method specificity, contribution quality, frontier leverage, feasibility, validation focus, and venue readiness. The overall score weights method specificity and contribution quality most heavily, and a READY verdict requires a score of at least 9 with no drift.

Can a research refinement session resume after interruption?

Yes. The skill writes REFINE_STATE.json after every phase with the current round, reviewer thread ID, and last score. If the state is under 24 hours old and marked in_progress, the session resumes from the next phase with reviewer thread continuity intact.

When should I not use iterative LLM review for research planning?

Avoid it when the core research problem itself is still undefined, since the skill assumes a visible problem and only refines the technical route. It is also unsuitable if you lack access to the Codex MCP reviewer model or grounding literature for the domain.

How does the skill prevent research proposals from becoming overbuilt?

It enforces a simplicity check each round, caps core experiments at 3, primary claims at 2, and new trainable components at 2. Reviewer suggestions that add unnecessary modules or drift from the Problem Anchor are explicitly rejected with documented pushback.