research-review

Review research documents using the Rule of 5 methodology.

1|Updated Jan 31, 2026

Search Tags:#quality assurance #completeness #document analysis #accuracy #iterative refinement #rule of 5 #research review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/charly-vibes/wai --skill research-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-review
Source: https://github.com/charly-vibes/wai/tree/main/.agents/skills/research-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/charly-vibes/wai --skill research-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the rigorous review of research documents, ensuring accuracy, completeness, clarity, and actionable insights before they are integrated into project workflows.

Core Features & Use Cases

Rule of 5 Review: Conducts a structured, five-pass review process focusing on different quality aspects.
Convergence Check: Iteratively refines the review based on identified issues until a predefined quality threshold is met.
Use Case: When a new research paper on a potential AI model is submitted, this Skill can perform an initial deep-dive to flag any factual inaccuracies, missing information, or unclear conclusions, providing a summarized report for human experts.

Quick Start

Review the research document located at 'research/model-evaluation.md' using the Rule of 5 methodology.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate research document review for accuracy and completeness?▼

To automate research document review, you can use an iterative process that evaluates claims against evidence and identifies knowledge gaps. This method assesses accuracy, completeness, clarity, and actionability to ensure research is ready for project integration.

What is the Rule of 5 methodology for reviewing research documents?▼

The Rule of 5 methodology is a structured, five-pass iterative review process. It evaluates research documents across five quality aspects—accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, and context integration—refining the assessment until a quality threshold is met.

How do I check if a research paper has knowledge gaps before project integration?▼

To check for knowledge gaps before project integration, perform a deep-dive structural coherence analysis. This evaluates claims against available evidence, flags missing information, and verifies practical applicability for decision-making.

Can I use iterative refinement to assess the actionability of a research document?▼

Yes, iterative refinement can assess research document actionability. By performing multiple review passes and convergence checks, the process verifies practical applicability and ensures the document yields actionable insights for decision-making workflows.

Does automated research document review support project context integration?▼

Automated research document review supports project context integration by evaluating how well the document aligns with existing workflows. It analyzes structural coherence and practical applicability to ensure insights are actionable within the broader project.

What are the limitations of using an iterative review process for document analysis?▼

An iterative review process for document analysis requires multiple passes to reach convergence, which may demand more processing time. It relies on a structured output format for each pass and requires a final convergence assessment to verify quality thresholds.