skills.rest
satsuki-64
satsuki-64COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

research-review

Identify logical gaps, unjustified claims, and missing experiments in research work.

2|Updated Mar 29, 2026
Search Tags:#experiments#papers#briefing#research-review#external-review#critical-analysis
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow --skill research-review-satsuki-64
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-review
Source: https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow/tree/main/.skills/research-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow --skill research-review-satsuki-64

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers obtain thorough, objective feedback on their work by orchestrating structured, multi-round reviews from a GPT-powered reviewer, accelerating critique quality and clarity.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured critique: identifies gaps, methodological weaknesses, and missing experiments.
  • Round-by-round dialogue: iterative feedback with evidence-backed responses.
  • Decision-ready outputs: generates a final consensus report, claims matrix, and action plan for next steps.
  • Use cases: researchers seeking a NeurIPS/ICML-level review of a paper, a draft methodology, or experimental results.

Quick Start

Provide your research context and documents so the external reviewer can begin a rigorous multi-round critique.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How can I get a critical review of my research paper to find logical gaps and missing experiments?▼

You can conduct a multi-round critical analysis of your draft methodology to identify methodological weaknesses and missing experiments, generating a final consensus report and a claims matrix for next steps.

What is the best way to perform a NeurIPS-level review of experimental results?▼

An effective research critique requires providing your research context and documents to an external reviewer, enabling a rigorous multi-round dialogue with evidence-backed responses.

Do I need a Codex MCP server to run an automated research critique?▼

Yes, an automated research critique is suitable for draft reports and papers, applying iterative feedback to evaluate methodological weaknesses and generate a final consensus on your findings.

How do I identify unjustified claims in my draft report before submission?▼

The critique outputs a review document, a final consensus, and an experiments plan, providing decision-ready feedback rather than a single pass of unstructured comments on your research.

Can I use an external reviewer to generate an experiments plan for my methodology?▼

Yes, you can use an external reviewer to generate an experiments plan for your methodology by providing your research context for a rigorous, multi-round critique.

What outputs does a structured research critique provide for decision-making?▼

A structured research critique provides decision-ready outputs including a review document, a final consensus report, a claims matrix, and an action plan detailing next steps.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
Leo1349Leo1349

research-review

Generate multi-round critical research reviews using an external Codex agent.

Community
Advanced
ShiienShiien
7

writing-outline

Draft research paper outlines with section structure and a Claims-Evidence Matrix.

Community
Intermediate
firecrawlfirecrawl
121

firecrawl-research-papers

Create literature reviews using Firecrawl Research semantic paper search and in-body claim verification.

Official
Advanced
kangning-huangkangning-huang
2

find-redflag

Simulate adversarial peer review to identify methodological and statistical weaknesses in research documents.

Community
Advanced