research-review

Review research papers through multi-round external critique with a claims-evidence matrix.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tqLi99/academic-paper-skills --skill research-review-tqli99
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-review
Source: https://github.com/tqLi99/academic-paper-skills/tree/main/skills/research-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tqLi99/academic-paper-skills --skill research-review-tqli99

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Get a structured, multi-round critical review of research work from an external Codex agent to surface theory gaps, methodological weaknesses, and writing issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-round external review by a senior model with domain expertise in engineering, robotics, and control systems.
  • Context-aware briefing by reading project narrative documents (drafts, notes, and claims) to generate targeted feedback.
  • Actionable deliverables such as a claims-evidence matrix, recommendations for experiments or simulations, and a revision plan.

Quick Start

Provide your paper draft or research idea and ask for a multi-round external critique.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get external peer review for a research paper draft?

You can obtain multi-round external critique by providing your research paper draft or ideas, which generates targeted feedback including a claims-evidence matrix and a revision plan.

What is a claims-evidence matrix in academic writing?

In a multi-round critical review, a claims-evidence matrix is an actionable deliverable that maps research claims against existing evidence to highlight methodological weaknesses and guide revisions.

Can I use automated critical analysis for engineering and robotics proposals?

Yes, this multi-round external critique process applies domain expertise in engineering and robotics to evaluate research proposals, experimental results, and ideas to surface methodological weaknesses.

How do I identify methodological weaknesses in my experimental results?

You can identify methodological weaknesses by submitting your experimental results for multi-round external critique, which reads project narratives to generate targeted feedback and an actionable improvement plan.

Does multi-round external critique work for theoretical research ideas?

Yes, multi-round external critique evaluates theoretical research ideas by reading project notes and drafts to surface theoretical gaps and deliver a structured, actionable revision plan.