research-synthesis

To synthesize research findings into a decision document, this Skill merges outputs from multiple analyses, weighs evidence based on established hierarchies, and resolves conflicts to generate a unified ADR-style document.

Resolving conflicting evidence from different research outputs requires applying an evidence hierarchy to prioritize findings, which this Skill uses to reconcile discrepancies and document the rationale for accepted or rejected outcomes.

Generating an ADR from scattered research findings involves synthesizing technical feasibility and critical research outputs, which this Skill transforms into a coherent document detailing context, decisions, and consequences.

Yes, you can trace decision rationale back to supporting evidence because this Skill generates ADR-style documents that explicitly map accepted, rejected, or uncertain outcomes to their underlying research.

You need to create an evidence-based decision record when you have scattered findings from multiple AI-driven analyses that must be transformed into a coherent, actionable recommendation with clearly stated trade-offs.

Evidence weighing relies on established hierarchies to prioritize different types of evidence, so applying this synthesis approach without a clear hierarchy reduces the robustness of the resulting decision document.