research-task-executor

Executes academic coding tasks with decomposition, implementation, and verification workflow.

Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Ricardo-Vae/codex-research-skills --skill research-task-executor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-task-executor
Source: https://github.com/Ricardo-Vae/codex-research-skills/tree/main/skills/research-task-executor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Ricardo-Vae/codex-research-skills --skill research-task-executor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It solves the problem of reliably executing user-specified academic coding tasks by enforcing a structured, research-grade workflow with consistency checks and careful assumptions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Precise trigger control: Only activates when the user inputs the exact phrase 科研启动-执行, preventing accidental or premature execution.
  • Multi-agent implementation planning: Uses multiple expert agents to decompose, design, implement, and verify tasks without skipping steps.
  • Research-code consistency guardrails: Performs environment checks and validates training/inference configuration alignment (including model naming and internal field verification).
  • Project-aware execution: Reads PROGRESS.md, PIPELINE.md, EXAMPLES.csv, and ISSUES.md (when present) and manages git workflow and documentation updates after completion.

Quick Start

Say: 科研启动-执行 then describe the科研代码任务 you want completed.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-task-executor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I execute academic coding tasks with strict research workflow and consistency checks?

Academic coding tasks with strict research workflow are executed by inputting the exact phrase 科研启动-执行 followed by your task description. The system then decomposes, implements, and verifies your code while performing training and inference configuration checks.

What is the best way to ensure training and inference configuration alignment in research code?

To ensure training and inference configuration alignment, the system performs automated consistency checks that verify model naming and internal fields. This prevents mismatches during research execution by validating environment configurations before completing code changes.

How do I track experiment progress and update scientific documentation automatically during model implementation?

Tracking experiment progress and updating scientific documentation happens automatically after task completion. The system reads existing PROGRESS.md, PIPELINE.md, EXAMPLES.csv, and ISSUES.md files when available, then manages git workflow and documentation updates.

Does the research execution workflow support multi-agent planning for code decomposition and verification?

The research execution workflow does support multi-agent planning, using multiple expert agents to decompose, design, implement, and verify tasks. This structured approach ensures no steps are skipped during academic coding execution.

Can I use project-aware execution to read existing pipeline and progress files before running experiments?

Project-aware execution can read existing pipeline and progress files before running experiments. It automatically detects and reads PROGRESS.md, PIPELINE.md, EXAMPLES.csv, and ISSUES.md files when present in your project directory.

Why does accidental execution prevention matter for scientific code changes and how is it controlled?

Accidental execution prevention matters for scientific code changes because premature runs can corrupt experiment tracking. It is controlled by requiring the exact activation phrase 科研启动-执行, ensuring tasks only start when explicitly intended.