research-writing-skill

Draft and revise Chinese-first research paper sections with evidence-grounded academic prose.

Updated Aug 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/littlt-momo-c-yfc/skills --skill research-writing-skill-littlt-momo-c-yfc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-writing-skill
Source: https://github.com/littlt-momo-c-yfc/skills/tree/main/skills/research-writing-skill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/littlt-momo-c-yfc/skills --skill research-writing-skill-littlt-momo-c-yfc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Writing and revising research papers requires turning scattered notes, experiment results, and reviewer comments into coherent, evidence-grounded academic prose, which is slow and error-prone when done manually. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Section Drafting and Revision: Draft or polish abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussions, conclusions, and related work in Chinese or English academic prose while preserving formulas, citations, and terminology. - Rebuttal and Reviewer Response Support: Compose responses to peer-review comments with claims tied to evidence. - Bundled Writing References: Load optional checklists, rhetorical move guides, brainstorming frameworks, and figure planning templates from the references directory. - Use Case: A graduate student pastes a rough experiment section and MATLAB results, then asks for a revised Results and Discussion section with vague claims replaced by measured comparisons. ## Quick Start Revise this introduction draft into a problem-first Chinese academic introduction with numbered limitations and claim-first contribution statements.

Frequently Asked Questions about research-writing-skill

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I revise a research paper introduction with AI?

Provide your draft introduction and target venue, and the skill rewrites it using a six-move structure: stakes, problem gap, key abstraction, design intuition, contributions, and results preview. It preserves your terminology and citations while making claims evidence-grounded.

How to write a rebuttal or response to peer reviewers?

Share the reviewer comments and your manuscript context, and the skill drafts point-by-point responses that tie each reply to evidence from your experiments. It avoids inventing data and flags claims that still need your supporting results.

Does it support Chinese academic writing and LaTeX?

Yes, it defaults to Chinese academic expression and works with LaTeX, Overleaf, and Markdown manuscripts. English paper titles, formulas, variables, software names, and citation entries are preserved unchanged.

When should I use a different skill instead of this one?

Use an office document skill when the deliverable is Word or PowerPoint, and a scientific computing skill when the task is MATLAB, Python, plotting, statistics, or literature search. This skill focuses on manuscript prose and argument structure.

Will it fabricate citations, data, or experiment results?

No, it explicitly refuses to invent data, DOIs, journal details, experiment settings, or author claims. It separates existing source material, user-confirmed content, inferences, and suggested extensions so you can verify each claim.