Research topics and produce structured briefs with cited sources.
npx skills add https://github.com/rakibulism/agent-skills-os --skill researcher-rakibulism
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: researcher Source: https://github.com/rakibulism/agent-skills-os/tree/main/skills/researcher Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rakibulism/agent-skills-os --skill researcher-rakibulism
This Skill helps you investigate a topic rigorously when you need a trustworthy answer instead of a quick guess. It breaks down broad questions, gathers evidence from credible sources, and synthesizes the result into a structured brief with citations.
Ask the researcher skill to investigate your topic, specify any constraints or depth preferences, and return a cited brief with clear findings and caveats.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To research a topic and get a cited brief, decompose the question into sub-questions, gather evidence from primary sources, and synthesize findings with inline citations. This separates facts from claims and highlights uncertainties.
Evidence-based option comparison works by gathering data from credible sources, reconciling conflicting information, and summarizing what is known versus uncertain. It produces a structured brief that triangulates facts for clear decision-making.
Yes, you can investigate a policy change by decomposing the question, prioritizing primary sources, and evaluating the strength of claims. This yields a structured summary with clear caveats and inline citations.
An investigative briefing separates fact from uncertainty by triangulating evidence from multiple sources, applying source evaluation, and explicitly marking claims and unknowns. The result is a structured brief with inline citations.
Automated research limitations include reliance on source availability and the need to distinguish strong evidence from weaker claims. It synthesizes known information but explicitly flags uncertainties rather than resolving them.
Source evaluation works for reconciling conflicts by prioritizing primary sources and distinguishing strong evidence from weak claims. It triangulates data across web and technical domains to produce a reliable, cited summary.
richardmbaileyAudits research proposals for novelty and validity before implementation.
jparkerwebConvert ambiguous research questions into structured discovery reports with cited sources.
Huzaifa4412Verify claims by comparing multiple sources and extracting key facts.
oakossSummarize technical content into executive summaries, PR descriptions, and meeting notes.
