What problem does it solve? Research proposals and scientific plans often suffer from unsupported claims, weak argument structure, template-like language, and scope creep. This Skill enforces an evidence-before-prose workflow that builds research canons, evidence tables, argument maps, and section contracts before drafting, then applies multi-gate quality review so proposals are defensible rather than merely fluent. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three Writing Modes: compose new proposals from a topic, revise existing drafts through claim extraction and structural diagnosis, or hybrid-expand drafts while preserving approved text. - Four-Gate QA Pipeline: dynamic expert review, anti-slop language scanning, automated validation of citations and reproducibility, and 8-dimension rubric scoring with stage thresholds. - Structured Project State: foundation files (scope, canon, evidence table, argument map, section contracts, style guide) plus state.json tracking scores, rounds, and technical debts. - Use Case: A doctoral student pastes a rough research direction in Chinese; the Skill builds the evidence table and argument map, drafts sections under contracts, runs QA at the proposal tier, and exports a formatted .docx for the supervisor. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to use researchwrite to turn your research topic or existing draft into an evidence-grounded proposal, specifying the mode (compose, revise, or hybrid) and target reader.