researchwrite

Compose, revise, and audit evidence-grounded research proposals with a four-gate QA pipeline.

Updated Jul 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace --skill researchwrite-huaibovip
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: researchwrite
Source: https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace/tree/main/plugins/nature-skills/skills/nature-proposal-writer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace --skill researchwrite-huaibovip

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires python-docx, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Research proposals and scientific plans often suffer from unsupported claims, weak argument structure, template-like language, and scope creep. This Skill enforces an evidence-before-prose workflow that builds research canons, evidence tables, argument maps, and section contracts before drafting, then applies multi-gate quality review so proposals are defensible rather than merely fluent. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three Writing Modes: compose new proposals from a topic, revise existing drafts through claim extraction and structural diagnosis, or hybrid-expand drafts while preserving approved text. - Four-Gate QA Pipeline: dynamic expert review, anti-slop language scanning, automated validation of citations and reproducibility, and 8-dimension rubric scoring with stage thresholds. - Structured Project State: foundation files (scope, canon, evidence table, argument map, section contracts, style guide) plus state.json tracking scores, rounds, and technical debts. - Use Case: A doctoral student pastes a rough research direction in Chinese; the Skill builds the evidence table and argument map, drafts sections under contracts, runs QA at the proposal tier, and exports a formatted .docx for the supervisor. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to use researchwrite to turn your research topic or existing draft into an evidence-grounded proposal, specifying the mode (compose, revise, or hybrid) and target reader.

Frequently Asked Questions about researchwrite

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a research proposal from a rough topic idea?

Use compose mode: provide your topic, target reader, and any existing materials. The workflow builds a research canon, evidence table, argument map, and section contracts before drafting, then scores each section against an 8-dimension rubric before export.

How to revise an existing proposal draft for weak claims?

Use revise mode, which extracts every claim from your text, compares it against the evidence table and canon, diagnoses structure, and produces a prioritized revision brief with P0/P1/P2 fixes. Unsupported claims are downgraded or flagged, never silently upgraded.

Does it support Chinese academic proposal writing?

Yes, it includes dedicated references for Chinese proposal anti-slop cleanup, Chinese review writing style, and NSFC-style constraints. The DOCX export script applies Times New Roman plus SimSun fonts with 1.5 line spacing for Chinese academic formatting.

Can it export proposals to Word documents?

Yes, the bundled build_proposal_docx.py script converts Markdown drafts to formatted .docx using python-docx, with 18pt centered titles, styled headings, 1-inch margins, and grid tables. Pandoc export is explicitly disallowed due to poor formatting.

What are the limitations of the proposal QA pipeline?

The pipeline stops after 3 revision rounds, when score improvements fall below 0.5, or when key evidence is missing. It never fabricates results or references; missing facts are marked AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED rather than hidden under fluent prose.