resolve

Orchestrate test-driven adjudication among competing agent positions with preserved dissent.

44|5|Updated Dec 10, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Mburdo/knowledge_and_vibes --skill resolve
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: resolve
Source: https://github.com/Mburdo/knowledge_and_vibes/tree/main/.claude/skills/resolve
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Mburdo/knowledge_and_vibes --skill resolve

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinates decision-making among conflicting agents using test-based adjudication to produce transparent, evidence-backed choices.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrates the full adjudication pipeline (positions, tests, execution, adjudication) with an auditable report.
  • Generates discriminating tests to clearly separate competing positions.
  • Produces final decisions with preserved dissent and user-facing rationale.

Quick Start

Provide a decision scenario with a question and candidate positions, then run through the resolve phases to produce a documented, evidence-based decision.

Frequently Asked Questions about resolve

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resolve disagreements between agents on architectural decisions?

Resolve multi-agent disagreements on architectural decisions by orchestrating evidence-based adjudication, using a test-driven framework to produce transparent, evidence-backed choices with an auditable report.

What is test-based adjudication for choosing between multiple valid approaches?

Test-based adjudication is a process that coordinates decision-making among conflicting agents by generating discriminating tests to clearly separate competing positions and validate architectural approaches.

How do I generate discriminating tests to evaluate competing agent positions?

You generate discriminating tests by providing a decision scenario with a question and candidate positions, running through the adjudication pipeline to clearly separate competing agent positions.

Can I use test-driven adjudication to pick an architectural approach when agents disagree?

Yes, you can apply test-driven adjudication when multiple valid approaches exist or when users request which approach for architectural decisions, requiring clearly defined positions and structured decisions with preserved dissent.

What is the best way to orchestrate evidence-backed choices among conflicting agents?

The best way to orchestrate evidence-backed choices is running through structured adjudication phases that execute tests and produce a documented final decision with preserved dissent and user-facing rationale.

Does test-based adjudication require clearly defined positions before resolving disputes?

Yes, test-based adjudication requires clearly defined positions and discriminating tests before resolving disputes, ensuring the structured decision report contains transparent, evidence-backed choices.