respond-to-pr

Triage and respond to GitHub pull request review feedback.

30|1|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/atomicinnovation/accelerator --skill respond-to-pr
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: respond-to-pr
Source: https://github.com/atomicinnovation/accelerator/tree/main/skills/github/respond-to-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/atomicinnovation/accelerator --skill respond-to-pr

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill guides a developer through triaging and responding to pull request review feedback by verifying reviewer comments against the codebase, making focused changes, and posting concise threaded replies on GitHub so reviews can be completed and the PR can merge.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured triage: Collects review threads and top-level comments, filters noise, groups related items, and orders them by priority (blocking → simple → complex).
  • Interactive remediation: Verifies feedback in-context, proposes changes, applies edits, commits per user preference, and posts drafted responses for user approval.
  • Thread resolution & recovery: Resolves review threads via GraphQL when appropriate, handles mid-workflow errors, and suggests fallbacks such as posting top-level comments when threads become stale.
  • Use case: Use this Skill when you have an open PR with multiple reviewers and unresolved inline comments that need verification, code changes, and threaded responses.

Quick Start

Run respond-to-pr with the PR number or URL to triage comments, confirm fixes, apply changes, and post threaded responses interactively.

Frequently Asked Questions about respond-to-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I address pull request review feedback across multiple unresolved GitHub threads?

Addressing pull request review feedback involves triaging unresolved GitHub threads by verifying comments against the codebase, making focused code edits, committing changes, and posting interactive replies directly in review threads to complete PR cleanup.

What is the best way to triage and prioritize code review comments on a GitHub pull request?

Triage and prioritize code review comments by collecting review threads and top-level comments via GitHub GraphQL and REST, filtering noise, grouping related items, and ordering by priority from blocking to simple to complex for structured remediation.

How do I resolve stale GitHub review threads when responding to PR feedback?

Resolve stale GitHub review threads by handling mid-workflow errors and suggesting fallbacks like posting top-level issue comments when threads become stale, resolving threads via GraphQL only when appropriate.

Does this PR review workflow require the gh CLI to post replies in GitHub threads?

Yes, the interactive PR review workflow requires the gh CLI to post drafted responses in review threads and manage commits according to user preference after making focused codebase edits.

Can I automate code edits and commit management for GitHub pull requests from inline review comments?

Yes, you can automate interactive remediation by verifying inline review comments in-context, proposing changes, applying focused edits to the codebase, and committing according to user preference before posting threaded responses.

What are the limitations of using GraphQL and REST APIs for pull request review thread triage?

Limitations of GraphQL and REST API triage include encountering stale threads where replies fail, requiring mid-workflow error handling and fallbacks like posting top-level issue comments to ensure PR feedback is still addressed.