resubmit-pipeline

Create isolated resubmission directories and scan for double-blind anonymity violations.

2|Updated Aug 12, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/goupup-ai/miccai25 --skill resubmit-pipeline-goupup-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: resubmit-pipeline
Source: https://github.com/goupup-ai/miccai25/tree/main/ARIS/skills/resubmit-pipeline
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/goupup-ai/miccai25 --skill resubmit-pipeline-goupup-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the pain point of resubmitting a polished, already-reviewed academic paper to a different venue under extremely tight time and compute constraints, where new experiments, bibliography edits, or framework changes are not allowed, and prior submission directories must remain completely untouched.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Non-destructive directory isolation: Creates a new sibling directory for the target venue submission, never modifying prior submission files to preserve existing work.
  • 5-layer double-blind anonymity scanning: Automatically detects and flags surface identifiers, self-citation phrasing, acknowledgments, cross-rebuttal references, and internal codenames that would violate double-blind submission rules.
  • Constrained text microedit orchestration: Coordinates parallel proof, claim, and citation audits, atomizes prior reviewer concerns into addressable text fixes, and enforces a strict edit whitelist to prevent unintended changes to the paper's structure or bibliography.
  • Use Case: A researcher whose paper was rejected at a workshop has 10 days to resubmit to a top-tier conference like ICLR, with no compute budget for new experiments, and needs to address all reviewer feedback via only text edits while meeting the new venue's page limit.

Quick Start

Use the resubmit-pipeline skill to resubmit your polished paper stored at /path/to/your/prior-submission to ICLR using the reviewer reports saved in /path/to/review-folder.

Frequently Asked Questions about resubmit-pipeline

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resubmit a rejected paper to a new venue without running new experiments?

To resubmit a rejected paper without new experiments, apply constrained text microedits to address prior reviewer concerns. This process atomizes feedback into addressable text fixes while preserving your existing submission directory and preventing framework or bibliography modifications.

What is double-blind anonymization scanning for academic paper resubmission?

Double-blind anonymization scanning for academic resubmission is an automated process that detects and flags surface identifiers, self-citation phrasing, acknowledgments, cross-rebuttal references, and internal codenames to ensure strict venue compliance.

How to address reviewer feedback via text microedits when migrating a paper?

To address reviewer feedback via text microedits when migrating a paper, atomize prior reviewer concerns into specific text fixes and apply an edit whitelist. This enforces strict constraints preventing unintended changes to the paper's structure or bibliography.

Can I preserve my original submission directory when resubmitting to a different conference?

Yes, you can preserve your original submission directory by using non-destructive directory isolation. This creates a new sibling directory for the target venue submission, ensuring prior submission files remain completely untouched.

What are the limitations of constrained paper resubmission under tight compute budgets?

Limitations of constrained paper resubmission under tight compute budgets include strict prohibitions on new experiments, bibliography modifications, and framework changes. You must resolve all reviewer feedback and audit findings using only permitted text microedits.