resubmit-pipeline

Orchestrate a text-only paper resubmission pipeline with compile and citation auditing.

1|1|Updated May 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zhuyingqin/ARIS-WEB --skill resubmit-pipeline-zhuyingqin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: resubmit-pipeline
Source: https://github.com/zhuyingqin/ARIS-WEB/tree/main/crates/runtime/assets/skills/resubmit-pipeline
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zhuyingqin/ARIS-WEB --skill resubmit-pipeline-zhuyingqin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires latexmk, pdfinfo, rsync, diff, grep, cp, mkdir, awk, sed, and includes assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It solves the problem of porting an already-polished, camera-ready-style paper to a new venue without violating hard constraints like no new experiments, no bibliography edits, and never overwriting prior submissions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Venue-safe resubmission orchestration: creates a new sibling submission directory and composes the target-venue main file without mutating the original base submission.
  • Quality gates before edits: compiles under the target venue style, checks page limits, and runs a multi-layer anonymity scan when applicable.
  • Text-only microedits from reviewer feedback: audits proofs/claims/citations, then performs constrained edit-loop iterations using a generated edit whitelist and citation-aware soft-only handling.
  • Adversarial residual-risk triage + final export: runs an argument-kill gate to surface unresolved critical issues and then performs final compile + diff reporting, with optional Overleaf push.

Use case: you have a rejected or withdrawn polished paper formatted for venue A, you want to resubmit the same technical work to venue B under a tight deadline, and you must incorporate reviewer concerns only via allowed text microedits.

Quick Start

Run the resubmit-pipeline skill with the polished paper directory, the target venue name, and the review-corpus path to produce a new compiled resubmission folder ready for Overleaf export.

Frequently Asked Questions about resubmit-pipeline

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resubmit a LaTeX paper to a new venue without adding new experiments or editing the bibliography?

To resubmit a LaTeX paper without new experiments or bib edits, use a text-only resubmission pipeline that creates a sibling submission directory, applies constrained edit-whitelist microedits from reviewer feedback, and enforces citation auditing in soft-only mode.

Can I incorporate reviewer feedback into a paper resubmission while keeping the original submission intact?

Yes, paper resubmission can incorporate reviewer feedback while keeping the original submission intact by using phase-guarded directory isolation to compose the target-venue main file without mutating the base paper directory.

What is a text-only paper resubmission pipeline and when do I need it?

A text-only paper resubmission pipeline ports an already-polished, camera-ready LaTeX paper to a new venue via allowed microedits, needed when you must absorb prior reviewer reports safely under strict constraints like no new experiments.

Does the paper resubmission workflow check anonymity and page limits before applying text microedits?

Yes, the paper resubmission workflow enforces quality gates before edits by compiling under the target venue style, checking page limits, and running a multi-layer anonymity scan to ensure venue compliance.

What's the best way to export a resubmitted LaTeX paper to Overleaf after incorporating reviewer reports?

The best way to export a resubmitted LaTeX paper to Overleaf is to run a final compile and diff reporting step after adversarial residual-risk triage, followed by an optional Overleaf push to sync the new sibling submission directory.

Are there limitations when using a text-only resubmission pipeline for rejected papers?

Limitations of a text-only resubmission pipeline include strict constraints against adding new experiments or editing the bibliography, meaning unresolved critical issues from an adversarial kill-argument triage must be surfaced rather than fixed with new data.