result-report-generator

Generate structured experiment reports comparing candidate methods from model outputs.

Updated Jul 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/echo-ice/mathmodeling-ssl --skill result-report-generator-echo-ice
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: result-report-generator
Source: https://github.com/echo-ice/mathmodeling-ssl/tree/main/.codex/skills/result-report-generator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/echo-ice/mathmodeling-ssl --skill result-report-generator-echo-ice

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the generation of comprehensive experiment reports and final result analysis from model experiment outputs, streamlining the process for modelers and paper writers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Experiment Report Generation: Automatically generate structured reports comparing multiple candidate methods and providing actionable feedback.
  • Result Analysis: Lay out the quality of results and suggest method revisions or proceed directions based on evidence.
  • Use Case: After running experiments on different methods, use this Skill to create a report that compares the performance of each method, aiding in the decision-making process for selecting the best method or revising underperforming ones.

Quick Start

Generate a report for Q1 by using the result-report-generator skill on the experiment outputs.

Frequently Asked Questions about result-report-generator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate experiment report generation from multiple model outputs?

Automate experiment report generation by processing model experiment outputs alongside method plans and data files. This produces structured reports comparing multiple candidate methods, delivering actionable feedback and evidence for method selection or revision decisions.

What is the best way to compare multiple candidate methods after running experiments?

Compare multiple candidate methods by analyzing experiment outputs to evaluate result quality and performance differences. The process generates structured evidence and feedback, highlighting which method performs best and suggesting proceed directions or revisions for underperforming approaches.

Do I need specific data files and method plans to generate a structured experiment report?

Yes, generating a structured experiment report requires experiment outputs, method plans, and data files as mandatory inputs. These elements provide the raw evidence and contextual framework needed to compare candidate methods and suggest accurate revisions or proceed directions.

How does result analysis suggest proceed directions for model selection?

Result analysis suggests proceed directions by evaluating the quality of results from experiment outputs and providing evidence-based feedback. This identifies whether to select the best method, revise underperforming methods, or adjust the modeling strategy based on structured performance comparisons.

Can I use this approach for modeling experiments with varying method plans?

Yes, this approach supports modeling experiments with varying method plans by comparing multiple candidate methods simultaneously. It processes diverse experiment outputs to generate comprehensive reports, providing structured feedback for selecting the best method or revising alternative approaches.