result-to-claim

Evaluate experimental outcomes against intended claims using Codex judgments.

Updated May 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Mang30/myskills --skill result-to-claim-mang30
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: result-to-claim
Source: https://github.com/Mang30/myskills/tree/main/skills/result-to-claim
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Mang30/myskills --skill result-to-claim-mang30

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill resolves the gap between running experiments and confidently deciding what those results actually mean, so teams avoid overstating findings or missing required follow-ups.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Codex-based claim adjudication: Routes evidence to a verdict (yes, partial, or no) against an intended claim without post-hoc inflation.
  • Result collection from multiple sources: Aggregates metrics and context from W&B history, experiment logs/trackers, local logs, and research contracts.
  • Automated routing to next action: Updates findings and pipeline status, triggers ablation planning when appropriate, and optionally updates a research wiki with experiment/claim/idea outcomes.

Quick Start

Use the result-to-claim skill with your experiment description or wandb run identifier so it collects results, gets a Codex judgment, and routes you to the correct next step.

Frequently Asked Questions about result-to-claim

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify experiment results against intended claims using W&B history?

To verify experiment results against intended claims, you can use this Skill to aggregate metrics from W&B history and run a Codex judgment to evaluate whether outcomes support, partially support, or fail to support your claims.

What is the best way to automate research workflows for ambiguous experiment outcomes?

Automating research workflows for ambiguous outcomes involves collecting evidence from local logs or trackers and applying a Codex judgment to route next steps, triggering ablation planning or pivoting when results are unclear.

Can I use local experiment logs for claim verification if I don't have W&B?

Yes, you can use local experiment logs for claim verification, as the Skill supports aggregating metrics and context from local logs, experiment trackers, and research contracts to run the Codex evaluation.

How does Codex adjudication handle post-hoc inflation in research findings?

Codex adjudication handles post-hoc inflation by routing collected evidence to a strict verdict of yes, partial, or no against an intended claim, preventing teams from overstating findings after experiments are completed.

How do I update a research wiki with experiment outcomes and claim verdicts?

To update a research wiki with experiment outcomes, the Skill automatically routes the Codex verdict and aggregated evidence to your findings pipeline and optionally updates research-wiki artifacts with experiment, claim, and idea results.

What are the limitations of using automated result evaluation for claim writing?

A key limitation is that automated result evaluation requires support for W&B history or normalized local experiment logs to parse Codex verdict fields, meaning incomplete or unstructured logs may prevent accurate claim adjudication.