What problem does it solve?
This Skill resolves the gap between running experiments and confidently deciding what those results actually mean, so teams avoid overstating findings or missing required follow-ups.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Codex-based claim adjudication: Routes evidence to a verdict (yes, partial, or no) against an intended claim without post-hoc inflation.
- Result collection from multiple sources: Aggregates metrics and context from W&B history, experiment logs/trackers, local logs, and research contracts.
- Automated routing to next action: Updates findings and pipeline status, triggers ablation planning when appropriate, and optionally updates a research wiki with experiment/claim/idea outcomes.
Quick Start
Use the result-to-claim skill with your experiment description or wandb run identifier so it collects results, gets a Codex judgment, and routes you to the correct next step.