retro

Analyze git commit history to generate a team-aware weekly retrospective.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ligianehua/Gstack --skill retro-ligianehua
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: retro
Source: https://github.com/ligianehua/Gstack/tree/main/retro
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ligianehua/Gstack --skill retro-ligianehua

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Weekly retrospectives are time-consuming and brittle when done manually. This Skill analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics to deliver a persistent, team-aware view of what happened, what went well, and where to improve.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Analyzes per-person contributions with praise and growth areas.
  • Tracks historical trends across sprints to surface patterns and bottlenecks.
  • Proactively suggests focus areas at sprint end or on demand via /retro.

Quick Start

Invoke the retro workflow by running the /retro command to generate the latest weekly retrospective for the current repository.

Frequently Asked Questions about retro

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a weekly git retrospective for my engineering team?

This Skill generates a weekly retrospective by analyzing git commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics to summarize per-author contributions and surface growth opportunities. It requires access to git history and per-commit data to compute individual engineering metrics.

Can I track per-person engineering metrics from commit history automatically?

Yes, you can track per-person engineering metrics automatically by analyzing commit history and per-commit data. This Skill computes individual code quality metrics and work patterns to highlight team praise and specific growth opportunities for each author.

What do I need to generate team-aware sprint retrospectives from git data?

To generate team-aware sprint retrospectives from git data, you need access to your repository's git history and per-commit data. This allows the Skill to compute per-author metrics and output a structured retrospective for review and planning.

How does analyzing commit history improve sprint retrospectives compared to manual review?

Analyzing commit history improves sprint retrospectives by providing a persistent, data-driven view of work patterns and code quality metrics, replacing brittle manual reviews. It surfaces historical trends and bottlenecks across sprints to objectively guide team improvement.

Does this approach work for tracking historical engineering trends across multiple sprints?

Yes, this approach works for tracking historical engineering trends across multiple sprints. It analyzes historical commit data to surface recurring patterns and bottlenecks, proactively suggesting focus areas for continuous team improvement at sprint end.