reversa-audit

To check for contradictions between project requirements and roadmaps, run a strict cross-artifact audit comparing requirements.md, roadmap.md, and actions.md to identify missing coverage and conflicting logic. This validates that all defined tasks are logically linked and free of circular dependencies.

Cross-artifact validation for project documentation is a read-only audit process that compares requirements, roadmaps, and action plans to identify contradictions and gaps. It ensures architectural consistency and validates that all functional requirements are logically linked without circular dependencies.

You audit documentation for missing functional coverage before a sprint by triggering a cross-check report across your project artifacts. This process verifies that every defined functional requirement is mapped to a specific task and ensures no contradictory terminology exists across your documentation.

Yes, you can detect circular dependencies in project action plans by running a strict audit across your documentation framework. The audit validates that all defined tasks and requirements are logically linked and explicitly checks that the action plans are free of circular dependencies.

The best way to prioritize technical debt from documentation gaps is to use a severity-based reporting system during your audit. This categorizes findings from CRITICAL to LOW, helping you prioritize architectural risks and missing coverage identified between requirements and action plans.

No, the reversa framework audit does not modify your project files. It performs a strict read-only audit of project documentation to identify contradictions and gaps, ensuring your artifacts remain untouched while validating architectural consistency and functional coverage.