reversa-coding

Automated implementation tools execute code changes directly from an architectural plan while maintaining strict dependency order. This approach automatically maps new code to existing legacy components, generating detailed impact and regression reports to prevent rule violations and system regressions.

Tracking implementation progress during legacy refactoring is handled by executing tasks from a structured actions file. The process enforces strict dependency order and continuous progress tracking, ensuring every architectural component is updated sequentially without breaking existing constraints.

Yes, architectural implementation requires a pre-existing _reversa_sdd directory. This directory must contain architecture.md and domain.md files to define the system boundaries and legacy rules before automated coding and impact analysis can begin.

Automated impact analysis maps new code changes to architectural components defined during the legacy extraction phase. It generates documentation detailing how new implementations affect existing system rules and automatically establishes a regression watch list for future development cycles.

Yes, automated implementation can generate regression guardrails when adding features to a complex codebase. It creates a watch list of critical legacy rules extracted from architecture documentation, preventing future regressions during subsequent development cycles.

Architecture and domain markdown files are required because they define the structural constraints and legacy system rules. Automated implementation relies on these documents to map code changes accurately and generate valid impact and regression reports for the existing codebase.