reversa-curator

Analyze legacy system specifications to classify business rules for migration.

Updated May 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/silaslopes100/lojacarmenedaniel --skill reversa-curator-silaslopes100
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reversa-curator
Source: https://github.com/silaslopes100/lojacarmenedaniel/tree/main/.agents/skills/reversa-curator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/silaslopes100/lojacarmenedaniel --skill reversa-curator-silaslopes100

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the complex decision-making process during system migrations by evaluating legacy specifications against new architectural paradigms, ensuring that business rules are correctly migrated, discarded, or flagged for human intervention.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Rule Classification: Categorizes legacy business rules into MIGRAR, DESCARTAR, or DECISÃO HUMANA based on a predefined migration brief and paradigm decision.
  • Paradigm Alignment: Identifies legacy artifacts that are no longer necessary due to modern architectural shifts, such as moving from procedural locks to event-driven idempotency.
  • Traceability: Generates comprehensive logs (target_business_rules.md and discard_log.md) that provide full auditability for the migration team.

Quick Start

Execute the reversa-curator skill to analyze the legacy specifications in the _reversa_sdd directory and generate the migration decision artifacts.

Frequently Asked Questions about reversa-curator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I determine which legacy business rules to migrate or discard during a system migration?

To determine which legacy business rules to migrate or discard, analyze legacy specifications against new architectural paradigms to classify rules into migrate, discard, or human decision categories based on a predefined migration brief.

How does paradigm alignment identify legacy artifacts that are no longer necessary?

Paradigm alignment identifies unnecessary legacy artifacts by evaluating old specifications against new architectural shifts, such as moving from procedural locks to event-driven idempotency, and flagging obsolete business rules for automatic discarding.

What's the best way to maintain traceability when migrating business rules across an architectural paradigm shift?

The best way to maintain traceability when migrating business rules is to generate comprehensive target_business_rules.md and discard_log.md audit files, providing full visibility into migration decisions and discarded artifacts.

What inputs do I need to resolve ambiguities in legacy system migration specifications?

To resolve ambiguities in legacy system migration specifications, you need access to migration briefs, architectural paradigm decisions, and unit-level requirements to maintain consistency across the migration lifecycle.

Why does my legacy business rule migration produce inconsistencies between target rules and discarded artifacts?

Legacy business rule migration produces inconsistencies when the curation process lacks access to defined paradigm decisions and unit-level requirements, preventing accurate classification of ambiguities into migrate, discard, or human intervention categories.