reversa-quality

To audit feature requirements for textual clarity, run a quality audit that checks each statement for unambiguous meaning, ensuring the requirements are ready for implementation planning and coding without rework.

A requirements completeness and consistency check verifies required template sections, terminology consistency, and alignment with project principles to ensure textual quality before turning requirements into a plan and code.

To validate Gherkin scenarios for missing edge cases, a scenario quality validation evaluates whether happy paths, edge cases, and coverage expectations are present, avoiding gaps in coverage before implementation.

Yes, you can audit requirements without modifying the original requirements.md file because the audit produces a structured report saved atomically to feature-dir/audit/requirements-audit.md, leaving the source document untouched.

The best way to prepare requirements for implementation planning is to perform a forward-cycle requirement review that eliminates unclear wording and missing information, producing a structured audit report for the next coding phase.

Your implementation plan may fail due to ambiguous requirements because unclear wording and missing information in the requirements.md cause rework, which a textual clarity audit identifies before planning begins.