review

Analyze pull requests for HTML, CSS, and JavaScript issues.

Updated Apr 30, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/a-tabiji/atima-lp --skill review-a-tabiji
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/a-tabiji/atima-lp/tree/main/.claude/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/a-tabiji/atima-lp --skill review-a-tabiji

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill reduces manual PR reviews by systematically evaluating HTML, CSS, and JavaScript quality, UX consistency, and accessibility, and by classifying findings into Critical, Warning, Suggestion, and Question categories.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Code quality checks: evaluates HTML semantics, CSS structure and variables, and JavaScript error handling and performance.
  • UX & accessibility review: ensures visual consistency, proper ARIA usage, keyboard navigation, and readable headings.
  • Structured review reports: categorizes issues into Critical/Warning/Suggestion/Question and summarizes actionable comments for PR threads.
  • Use case: a developer submits a PR with UI changes; the skill produces a review report you can paste into GitHub comments to guide fixes.

Quick Start

Provide the PR URL or number to initiate a deterministic PR review and receive an actionable, categorized report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate pull request code reviews for HTML, CSS, and JavaScript?

Automate pull request code reviews by providing a PR URL or number to analyze HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The review identifies code quality, UX, and accessibility issues, categorizing findings into critical, warning, suggestion, and question reports for standard QA checks.

What is included in an automated accessibility and UX review for web projects?

An automated accessibility and UX review evaluates visual consistency, proper ARIA usage, keyboard navigation, and readable HTML headings. It systematically checks web projects to ensure UI changes meet quality standards and structured findings are generated for GitHub PR threads.

Can I use this automated PR review to check HTML semantics and CSS structure?

Yes, you can use this PR review to check HTML semantics, CSS structure and variables, and JavaScript error handling. It evaluates frontend code quality and outputs a deterministic review report suitable for integration with GitHub PRs and standard lint checks.

How do I categorize code review findings into critical and warning levels?

Categorize code review findings by applying automated analysis to classify issues into critical, warning, suggestion, and question categories. This structured approach summarizes actionable comments for PR threads, guiding developers through necessary UI and accessibility fixes.

Does this automated code review work without external lint dependencies?

Yes, this automated code review works without external dependencies. It independently analyzes pull requests to evaluate HTML, CSS, and JavaScript quality, producing deterministic review reports that integrate seamlessly with existing GitHub PR workflows and standard QA checks.