review-agent

Review code changes for security, performance, correctness, and pattern compliance.

Updated Mar 14, 2026

Search Tags:#performance #security #remediation #quality #review #findings

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/clouseryan/agentic-skills --skill review-agent-clouseryan

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-agent
Source: https://github.com/clouseryan/agentic-skills/tree/main/dev-team/reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/clouseryan/agentic-skills --skill review-agent-clouseryan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a rigorous, constructive code-review capability that examines changes for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, pattern compliance, and overall quality, delivering actionable remediation guidance.

Core Features & Use Cases

Systematic review of changed files and their calling context to identify security risks, performance bottlenecks, and pattern deviations.
Generates structured review reports with severity-rated findings and explicit remediation steps suitable for pull requests and gate checks.
Use cases include pre-merge validation, ongoing code quality improvement, and architectural conformance reviews with clear follow-ups.

Quick Start

Provide the changed files or PR diff to the reviewer to generate a structured report with severity-rated findings and remediation suggestions.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate security and performance checks for code changes in a pull request?▼

Automate security and performance checks for code changes by applying a code review capability to the PR diff and related tests. This generates a structured findings report with severity ratings and explicit remediation steps suitable for pre-merge validation.

What is the best way to generate remediation suggestions for pattern compliance deviations in my code?▼

The best way to generate remediation suggestions for pattern compliance deviations is to run a systematic review on changed files and their calling context. This identifies architectural issues and outputs actionable guidance to fix pattern deviations.

Can I use automated code review for ongoing quality improvement without a pull request workflow?▼

Yes, you can use automated code review for ongoing quality improvement outside of a pull request workflow. Simply provide the changed files directly to generate a structured report with severity-rated findings and clear follow-up steps.

Does code review for pull requests check related test files or just the changed source code?▼

Code review for pull requests checks both the changed source code and related test files. Applying the review to changed files alongside their tests ensures correctness validation and produces reproducible verification against established patterns.

How does severity rating work in automated code review findings reports?▼

Severity rating in automated code review findings reports works by evaluating identified security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and correctness issues, then structuring them into a clear report with explicit remediation steps based on risk priority.

When do I need pattern compliance validation for code changes?▼

You need pattern compliance validation for code changes when performing pre-merge gate checks or architectural conformance reviews. It identifies deviations from established patterns and provides clear, reproducible follow-ups to maintain code quality.