review

Identify production-risk findings in a code diff before merging.

Updated Mar 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AkbarDevop/gstack-codex --skill review-akbardevop
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/AkbarDevop/gstack-codex/tree/main/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AkbarDevop/gstack-codex --skill review-akbardevop

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Pre-Landing Review helps teams detect and fix critical issues in a diff before merging, reducing risk and rework downstream.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Atomic two-pass review prioritizes critical issues (SQL/data safety, race conditions, and LLM output trust) and surfaces actionable improvements.
  • Reads the diff against the repository default branch, fetches the full changes, and outputs a structured findings report for PR discussions.
  • Use Case: When preparing a feature branch for merge, run this skill to surface potential production risks and guidance for remediation.

Quick Start

Run the pre-landing review on your current branch diff to generate a concise risk report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a pre-landing code review and when do I need it?

A pre-landing code review identifies production risks in a diff before merging. You need it when preparing a feature branch to catch critical issues like SQL/data safety and race conditions early, reducing downstream rework.

How do I run a pre-landing review on my current branch diff?

Run the review skill on your current branch to extract the diff against the default branch. It fetches full changes and performs a two-pass critique using a checklist to output a structured findings report.

What specific production risks does the code review checklist look for?

The code review checklist prioritizes critical production risks including SQL and data safety issues, race conditions, and untrusted LLM output handling, flagging them first to provide concise remediation fixes.

Can I use this review skill on diffs against any branch?

Apply this review skill to diffs against the repository default branch. It resolves the base branch, extracts the diff, and performs a two-pass critique to generate structured risk findings for PR discussions.

How does the two-pass critique mechanism work for code quality assessment?

The two-pass critique mechanism analyzes a code diff by first prioritizing critical issues like data safety and race conditions, then surfacing actionable improvements to generate a structured code quality risk report.